This question would be better addressed to your lawyer. Trying to handle this without a lawyer is very likely a grave mistake.
Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.
This would depend on who is deciding it is for the best and what some of the circumstances are in the situation; Ex are you married, custodial parent non custodial are children involved. If your trying to kidnap someone it;s illegal so that would not be advisable
Generally, Missouri law provides that it is not unlawful for a person who is not under color of law to intercept oral communications as long as they are a party, or one party has given consent. Instructing a child to record conversation at her father's home does not meet the requirements for a legal recording. However, there are other serious legal issues that would be involved with that activity.The parent using their child to spy on the non-custodial parent, or secretly gather information for the custodial parent's use, would constitute parental alienation. Teaching the child to spy and making her do it would constitute a major interference in the child's relationship with her father. It can have a devastating effect on both the non-custodial parent and the child. The courts are well aware of the existence of parental alienation and its effects. It is not viewed lightly. The court can impose sanctions and a parent who persists in trying to alienate the child from the other parent could eventually lose custody. Any recordings presented to the court as evidence against the non-custodial parent may backfire and prove to be a problem for the custodial parent instead.If you plan to use a child to spy you should consult with an attorney before you act. You should also take a parenting class through the court geared toward divorce and children, and obtain some counseling. If you have been a victim or think you have been a victim of child spying you should consult with an attorney and take legal action. In that case, the custodial parent does not have the child's best interest in mind.See related link.
If you have primary physical custody you are entitled to support. How much support is figured in a formula based on how much money each of you makes and how many days (or overnights) each of you has time with the child. Depending on the state, if the child stays with the other parent over a certain set amount of time, then that parent is responsible to pay less child support. Most states are trying to push joint physical custody where the child spends 1/2 to 2/3 of the time with the primary caretaker and the rest with the other parent.
He can always ask the courts to stop you from moving, however you are under no obligation to do something just because he asks. The court must agree with him and give the mandate that you remain in your state. If you have legitimate reasons for wanting to move to another state and are not just trying to get the children away from him the court will most likely not award his request. However, if you are just being vindictive against him, or the court believes that you are, you might be prevented from moving.AnswerYes, and it depends on the judge and your state how they handle it. It is usually allowed if it is for a valid reason such as new and BETTER employment or if, married again, your spouse has to relocate. However, if the court views it as an attempt to move as far away from their Dad as possible, his injunction will be approved.AnswerIf you have full custody of the children you must notify the court where the custodial order was issued of you intention of moving. The father will be notified and if he so chooses he will be given the opportunity to present arguments as to why the move should not be allowed. It is very rare for a judge to refuse a custodial parent's request to relocate.What generally happens is, visitation arrangements will be modified to allow the non-custodial parent equal opportunity for seeing the children. For example, rather than weekends the order might be changed to holidays, birthdays, school vacation (if applicable) and so forth.The burden of visitation will still remain on the non-custodial parent as to travel expenses and related issues unless the couple agree otherwise. Any relocation will not change the terms of an existing child support order.
see links
The following is general since you didn't include any details.First, you should make certain the school is notified that you are the custodial parent and you should provide the school with a certified copy of the decree that awarded sole legal custody to you. If you have sole legal custody you should inform the school that the non-custodial parent is not allowed to take the child during the school day or pick the child up when school is dismissed. If the non-custodial parent persists in trying to take the child from school then you will need to address the situation in court.If the non-custodial parent is allowed to pick the child up after school pursuant to your visitation order then you must obey the order.The following is general since you didn't include any details.First, you should make certain the school is notified that you are the custodial parent and you should provide the school with a certified copy of the decree that awarded sole legal custody to you. If you have sole legal custody you should inform the school that the non-custodial parent is not allowed to take the child during the school day or pick the child up when school is dismissed. If the non-custodial parent persists in trying to take the child from school then you will need to address the situation in court.If the non-custodial parent is allowed to pick the child up after school pursuant to your visitation order then you must obey the order.The following is general since you didn't include any details.First, you should make certain the school is notified that you are the custodial parent and you should provide the school with a certified copy of the decree that awarded sole legal custody to you. If you have sole legal custody you should inform the school that the non-custodial parent is not allowed to take the child during the school day or pick the child up when school is dismissed. If the non-custodial parent persists in trying to take the child from school then you will need to address the situation in court.If the non-custodial parent is allowed to pick the child up after school pursuant to your visitation order then you must obey the order.The following is general since you didn't include any details.First, you should make certain the school is notified that you are the custodial parent and you should provide the school with a certified copy of the decree that awarded sole legal custody to you. If you have sole legal custody you should inform the school that the non-custodial parent is not allowed to take the child during the school day or pick the child up when school is dismissed. If the non-custodial parent persists in trying to take the child from school then you will need to address the situation in court.If the non-custodial parent is allowed to pick the child up after school pursuant to your visitation order then you must obey the order.
If there was a custody schedule - you have the right to have it brought before the judge; that the custodial parent refused to abide by mandated visitation.That said, how will you answer the question "What did you do during those ten years to remedy the situation?" If you have receipts, phone records and reports from investigators you paid over the years who where not able to find the custodial parent. You could possibly walk away with sole custody of the children. While the custodial parent faces charges of interfering with a custody order.But! and it is a big one, were the children well cared for during the ten years? Is the custodial parent trying (from the heart), to remedy the situation now? Will you have 50/50 custody in the future? Is it in the best interest of the children or is it out of anger, if you were to press the issue? You need to answer these questions from the heart and then you need to have a heart to heart with the other parent and work out a schedule that is in the best interest of your kids. Good luck, I hope it all works out for you and your kids.
Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.Generally, the non-custodial parent must have a good reason to make the accusation. Child Protective Services will investigate and determine if there is proof of abuse. If they find no evidence of child abuse the custodial parent may be able to sue for damages if the non-custodial parent was only trying to interfere by submitting untrue accusations. They should proceed carefully.If the non-custodial parent makes the complaint in good faith but no abuse is found there will be no negative consequences for making the complaint.
not if you are the biological parent
Not sure what you're trying to ask. However, typically when a parent who has main custody goes to jail, the other parent will take the child in, or even a family member.
What do you mean by Bad Tricks? This can be interpretive.
This would depend on who is deciding it is for the best and what some of the circumstances are in the situation; Ex are you married, custodial parent non custodial are children involved. If your trying to kidnap someone it;s illegal so that would not be advisable
If they have joint custody they will need to take the matter to court. However, at the same time the parent who is preventing the therapy from happening should realize that a judge is likely to change the custody order if the parents do not get along well enough to agree on important matters that concern the child's health and welfare. The parent who is trying to arrange therapy, if it is warranted, should request sole legal custody so that squabbling with the other parent will not delay needed services for the child.If they have joint custody they will need to take the matter to court. However, at the same time the parent who is preventing the therapy from happening should realize that a judge is likely to change the custody order if the parents do not get along well enough to agree on important matters that concern the child's health and welfare. The parent who is trying to arrange therapy, if it is warranted, should request sole legal custody so that squabbling with the other parent will not delay needed services for the child.If they have joint custody they will need to take the matter to court. However, at the same time the parent who is preventing the therapy from happening should realize that a judge is likely to change the custody order if the parents do not get along well enough to agree on important matters that concern the child's health and welfare. The parent who is trying to arrange therapy, if it is warranted, should request sole legal custody so that squabbling with the other parent will not delay needed services for the child.If they have joint custody they will need to take the matter to court. However, at the same time the parent who is preventing the therapy from happening should realize that a judge is likely to change the custody order if the parents do not get along well enough to agree on important matters that concern the child's health and welfare. The parent who is trying to arrange therapy, if it is warranted, should request sole legal custody so that squabbling with the other parent will not delay needed services for the child.
Generally, Missouri law provides that it is not unlawful for a person who is not under color of law to intercept oral communications as long as they are a party, or one party has given consent. Instructing a child to record conversation at her father's home does not meet the requirements for a legal recording. However, there are other serious legal issues that would be involved with that activity.The parent using their child to spy on the non-custodial parent, or secretly gather information for the custodial parent's use, would constitute parental alienation. Teaching the child to spy and making her do it would constitute a major interference in the child's relationship with her father. It can have a devastating effect on both the non-custodial parent and the child. The courts are well aware of the existence of parental alienation and its effects. It is not viewed lightly. The court can impose sanctions and a parent who persists in trying to alienate the child from the other parent could eventually lose custody. Any recordings presented to the court as evidence against the non-custodial parent may backfire and prove to be a problem for the custodial parent instead.If you plan to use a child to spy you should consult with an attorney before you act. You should also take a parenting class through the court geared toward divorce and children, and obtain some counseling. If you have been a victim or think you have been a victim of child spying you should consult with an attorney and take legal action. In that case, the custodial parent does not have the child's best interest in mind.See related link.
That's a decision that only the judge can make, based on state law. If it appears to the judge that you're just trying to get away from the father, you had better have a good reason. If it's a legitimate reason to move, such as a better job or you need to be closer to family for support, the judge will probably allow your request, since a judge will be hesitant to mandate something as basic as your freedom to live where you want. But in the end, it will depend on the father's arguments and your reasons for wanting to leave the state and the state laws.
In difficult custody battles, it's best to keep a journal detailing things such as this. This can help when providing facts to the court showing a lack of interest in following any visitation agreements. Non-custodial parents can petition the court requesting a change in custody, but Judges do look at the facts, and take what is called status quo into account.