0
Organized as territories under douglas's controversial law of 1854 that left their decision on slavery up to popular sovereignty?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where was the dred Scott case tried?
It was taken all the way to the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice issued the controversial decision.
What was the consequences of the Dred Scott decision for the enslaved people?
The Dred Scott decision is known as the worst decision ever by the Supreme Court. It said that blacks could not be citizens. Slavery was a decision of the new territories.
How did the dred scott decision contribute to the growth of sectionalism?
The Dred Scott contributed to sectionalism by allowing slave owners to bring slaves into free states and still be considered property of the owner. This ruling allowed slavery to be expanded into the new territories and free states.
Why was the Dred-Scott court case a disaster for abolitionist?
1.) Slaves are not citizens and can't sue. 2.) Slaves are property. 3.) Slavery should be legal everywhere. It left the decision to allow slavery or not, up to the territories This would have tipped the scales of representation in favor of the pro-slavery South.
What was the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?
They decided that Dred Scott was still considered a slave and could not exercise the right of a free citizen to suethe reaction of that was that they claimed the the missouri compromise to be unconstitutionalThe answer apex folks would want is: Blacks weren't citizens and Congress couldn't outlaw slavery in the territories.
Organized as territories under the compromise of 1850 with their decision about slavery left up to popular sovereignty?
Utah and New Mexico
Organized as territories under the compromise of 1850 with their decision on slavery left up to popular sovereignty?
Utah and New Mexico
What is popular sovereignty and how did it affect territories becoming states?
Popular sovereignty was the right of the residents of these territories to vote themselves on the issue of slavery (in this case). In the Compromise of 1850, the territories of New Mexico and Utah were granted popular sovereignty to decide for themselves if slavery should be allowed or not in these areas.
What is an example sentence for controversial?
The decision was a very controversial one.The activist group PETA has been known to use controversial tactics.
Why did Stephen Douglas propose the Kansas Nebraska act lead to violence?
Plantation owners were outraged that slavery had been outlawed in the territories. People in the territories were angry that a new political party had been established. Many Americans disagreed with the Supreme Court decision to limit slavery in the territories. Opposing forces clashed because they disagreed about popular sovereignty and slavery.
What caused Southern slave owners to be happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
The freedom rides were organized to test?
the were organized to test a supreme court decision.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed parts of which previous decision?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, specifically the provision that prohibited slavery in territories north of the 36°30’ parallel. Instead, the Act allowed for the potential expansion of slavery into those territories based on popular sovereignty.
What involve allowing people to make the decision about what power will be given to the government?
popular sovereignty
What opened all territories to slavery?
dred scott decision
What is the significance of the Supreme Courts decision in Williams v North Carolina?
Significance: state sovereignty
What is the significants of the supreme courts decision in Williams v. North Carolina?
Significance: state sovereignty
