Both the Romans and the Greeks shared the Mediterranean but were separated by time, rather than geographical borders.
You see the Roman Empire (30 B.C. to 1450 A.D.) encircled the entire Mediterranean Sea (including modern day Greece). The empire stretched from Britain to Spain, the North shores of Africa to Egypt, from modern day Iran to Turkey, and across most of modern day Western Europe.
The Greek Empire (400 B.C. - 120 B.C.) was rather small until King Alexander of Macedon (Alexander the great) spread the kingdom from the Greek mainland and Egypt east across the Persian Empire.
However, the Geography of Italy varies greatly from that of Greece. Italy is, for the most part landlocked. As a peninsula it has much water frontage but the mainland cities are mostly inland. Greece is much more spread across vast archipelagos and has been known to be rocky. Each country has its share of mountains, cliffs, hills, and fertile soils.
The Etruscans changed Rome from a village of straw-roofed huts into a city of wood and brick buildings. They laid out streets, temples, and public buildings around a central square.Edit: The above one doesn't relate to geography though, and it doesn't mention Greece. Here is my answer:The landscape of Italy is similar to that of Greece, but the Apennines are not as rugged as Greece's mountains. As a result, the people in Italy were not split up into small, isolated communities like the Greeks. Italy had better farmland than Greece. With more capacity to produce food, Italy could support more people than Greece could.
Generally it is colder in England than in Greece.
The geography of Greece, characterized by its mountainous terrain and numerous islands, significantly influenced the development of independent city-states (poleis) rather than a unified empire. The mountains created natural barriers that fostered isolation and encouraged the growth of distinct cultural and political identities. Additionally, the proximity to the sea facilitated trade and maritime activities, leading to economic prosperity and the establishment of colonies. This diverse geography shaped a society that valued local governance, individuality, and adaptability.
The geography of Greece made communication and travel between regions challenging due to the rugged mountainous terrain and numerous islands. This geographical fragmentation also led to the development of independent city-states rather than a unified nation. Furthermore, the lack of fertile land limited agricultural production, which in turn influenced economic and social structures.
The absence of mechanised transport meant that land transport of more than 100 km was uneconomic, so water transport was the means of transporting goods.
Because of its geography.
Because of its geography.
Nubia has a higher elevation and less desert area than Egypt.
yes
It depends on where in ancient Greece. For example Sparta was very different than Athens.
Neither is better or worse. Just different.
The Etruscans changed Rome from a village of straw-roofed huts into a city of wood and brick buildings. They laid out streets, temples, and public buildings around a central square.Edit: The above one doesn't relate to geography though, and it doesn't mention Greece. Here is my answer:The landscape of Italy is similar to that of Greece, but the Apennines are not as rugged as Greece's mountains. As a result, the people in Italy were not split up into small, isolated communities like the Greeks. Italy had better farmland than Greece. With more capacity to produce food, Italy could support more people than Greece could.
Italy has fewer foreign debts and is much better than Greece's economy. Greece accounts for less than 2 per cent of the EU economy.
I don't know. But mby google has sum answers. Check it out. See ya.
Italy is a peninsula; it is centrally located on the continent (shape of a boot); city of Rome is the center of Italy.
Under Alexandeer Greece have a better army.
In anciient greece they did it naked. U spelled ancient wrong btw.