Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Temco Controls is a company that sell electronic and sensor control items. One can purchase many items from them such as thermostats, humidity and temperature transmitters.
Molecular genetics
Astronomers also use spectrometers to support the big bang theory.Spectrometer-identifies Redshifts in elements-Redshift indicates that objects are moving away, suggesting that they were once un ited. In other words; they have exploded and are now flying away.*Redshift is a shift in the frequency of a photon toward lower energy, or longer wavelength. The redshift is defined as the change in the wavelength of the light divided by the rest wavelength of the light, asz = (Observed wavelength - Rest wavelength)/(Rest wavelength)
Theoretical Physicist. Raj is an Astro Physicist, Leonard is an Experimental Physicist.
What kind of information or items, did he use to support his theory
his brain
hypothesis
He used fossils,climate changes,and landforms to support his theory.
he found fossles
climate,fossils,geology
He uses everything
He used plant and animals
You and I have the same 50% DNA as a banana.
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
Answers.com does not support or allow any information of this kind.
Alfred Wegener used various types of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of the continents, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, distribution of fossils, and matching of plant and animal species across continents. He also relied on similarities in geological structures and paleoclimate data to argue that the continents were once part of a single supercontinent called Pangaea.