The first to record observations of cells was Robert Hooke in 1665. He used a compound microscope to examine a thin slice of cork and described the small, box-like structures he observed as "cells." Hooke's work marked a significant milestone in the field of microscopy and laid the foundation for cell theory.
what is a way
this was not in question form... im assuming you ment this to be a true or false, yes or no question. In that sense it is true. he did do study cells and their was mnay more he did but im old and not quite sure
time measurement
German physician Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902)
Robert Hooke first viewed cells with a microscope. He began calling them cells because they resembled the cells in which monks lived and worked.
Galleleo
Yea... Robert Hooke examamined a cork cell under a microscope. He realized that it looked like tiny boxes which he later named "cells."
Anthony van Leeuwenhoek
The first scientist to view cells under a microscope was Robert Hooke, an English scientist, who observed cork cells in 1665. His observations marked the beginning of the cell theory in biology.
The sumerians
Record observations and ideas which are appropriate
Write down why you see.
A way to organize and record results and observations is using data table
You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".
No, absolutely not. You should be making observations as you go, and recording them. Then, when the experiment is over you can draw conclusions, but if you wait till after to record your observations, you won't remember them all.
A record of observations of the world
what is a way