Wegner could not identify a force that could move the continents
Because they felt like it!
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Because he could not explain how the continents moved.
Scientists initially rejected the idea of continental drift due to a lack of a plausible mechanism explaining how continents could move across the Earth's surface. The theory presented by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was based on geological and fossil evidence, but it lacked the supporting geophysical processes, leading to skepticism among the scientific community. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a comprehensive framework of mantle convection and sea-floor spreading, that continental drift was widely accepted. Thus, the rejection was more about the incomplete understanding of Earth’s dynamics rather than the evidence itself.
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century primarily because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move. His proposal lacked solid geological evidence and was seen as speculative, leading to skepticism among the scientific community. Additionally, the dominant geological theories of the time, such as fixed continents and land bridges, were more widely accepted. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a robust framework for understanding continental movement, that Wegener's ideas gained acceptance.
Because they felt like it!
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
Some scientists rejected the idea of continental drift because Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory, lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. In addition, the scientific community at the time held onto the prevailing belief in static continents and were resistant to accepting a new paradigm. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift became widely accepted.
The continental drift hypothesis proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was controversial because it challenged existing scientific beliefs about the stability of the Earth's crust and the concept of landmasses moving across the globe. Wegener's theory lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move, which led many scientists to reject it until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s provided a viable explanation.
yes
yes
Olive Branch Petition
Olive Branch Petition.
Because he could not explain how the continents moved.
will reject - I will reject his applicationgoing to reject - They are going to reject my applicationam /is /are rejecting + time phrase. - They are rejectinghis application tomorrow
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.