Regardless of who the agent is that actually repossesses a vehicle the responsibility will remain with the agency that actually accomplished the repossession, however, the Creditor is ultimately responsible for the actions of the agents that they assign an account to. The assigning agency, if they had no actual part in the repossession will probably not be responsible.
Professionals purchase error(s) and ommission insurance to have protection against claims against them of faulty services in which a monetary value can be affixed according to damages incurred.
Well, they should pay you back for any damages and pain they may have caused. If they were at fault, then the salon should be help responsible to compensate you. Otherwise, I don't know if I would trust the salon again. I would just switch salons, instead of running the chance that the same mistake happen again.
"Action over indemnity" refers to a legal principle where a party seeks compensation from another party for losses incurred, rather than relying solely on contractual indemnity provisions. In such cases, the injured party may pursue a direct legal action to recover damages, which may be more advantageous than waiting for indemnification under a contract. This concept often arises in liability cases, especially in construction or insurance contexts, where multiple parties may have overlapping responsibilities. It emphasizes the proactive approach of seeking recovery rather than passively waiting for indemnification.
The seller's personal remedies against the buyer by way of action for the price of the goods or for damages for non-acceptance are discussed in chapter 8. An unpaid seller may also have certain rights in rem-against the goods themselves - rights which are of special value in the case of the buyer's insolvency or inability to pay the price or damages.
The major risks involved in a business are : 1) Competition 2) Credit giving 3) damages and losses
The driver at fault is always responsible for damages incurred during an accident. The at fault insurance company is responsible for damages to your car.
They may require a credit check. Then just the rental contract. You will be responsible for damages.
The indemnifying party in a contract is the party that agrees to compensate the other party for any losses, damages, or liabilities that may arise from the contract. They are responsible for covering the costs and damages incurred by the other party due to breaches of the contract or other specified events.
Yes, you can sue the moving company for damages incurred during the relocation process. It is important to gather evidence of the damages and consult with a legal professional to understand your options for pursuing a lawsuit.
To prove a breach of contract, one must show that a valid contract existed, that one party failed to fulfill their obligations under the contract, and that the other party suffered damages as a result of the breach. This can be done through evidence such as written contracts, communication records, and documentation of the damages incurred.
Yes. If you were at fault then you are liable for the damages you incurred.
Yep, If you received notification and took no reasonable and prudent action to mitigate a loss you can be held liable through negligence for the damages incurred.
Yes, if you can prove that the he actually was negligent, and that his negligence caused your financial damages.
Not usually. Civil law exists that an individual who has wrongly incurred damages might be made whole again. It doesn't exist to enrich people who have incurred no damages even if a technical wrong occurred.
Usually anyone that is responsible should pay for damages that they caused.
== == In the event that you got into a car accident and it was not your fault but the other driver's, if he is insured, his insurance company is liable to pay for the damages of your vehicle. On the other hand, if the other driver is not insured, your own insurance company, provided you have a policy regarding uninsured or underinsured drivers, will be responsible for the damages your vehicle has incurred. They however, may have a right of action against the person responsible for the accident. The person who caused the damage to your vehicle is ultimately responsible for the damage to your vehicle regardless of whether there is an applicable insurance coverage or not. Whether you actually have the repairs done is none of their business.
Damages by the elements expected means that what you thought would happen did happen. If you thought the wind would blow the roof off and it did, then the damages by the elements expected is a true statement.