The first thing that happens in Act V is that Romeo tells us about a dream he had.
vc v
the answers is vc v
Because it is not a "J" sheet.
It is not equal.
It had to do with the Court's attempt to apply the Interstate Commerce Laws in a novel and unique way. See below link for a full discussion:
US v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr., 514 US 549 (1995)The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Lopez, holding Congress had exceeded its power under the Interstate Commerce Clause by passing the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. According to the Court, the government's convoluted argument that the Act was intended to reduce violent crime, which would have an economic impact on commerce between the states.Majority (for Lopez)Chief Justice William H. RehnquistJustice Sandra Day O'ConnorJustice Antonin ScaliaJustice Anthony KennedyJustice Clarence ThomasDissentingJustice Stephen BreyerJustice John Paul StevensJustice David H. SouterJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The justices of the supreme court sided with Presdent Roosevelt and said that Hirabayashi broke the law in breaking the curfew. This court case was more or less thrown out of the court and thrown by the way side. He tried to take it back later in his life but was denided.
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
Lopez "won". Lopez was a high student who brought a gun into school. He was charged with violating Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990. He was tried and convicted. He appealed the decision, saying Congress didn't have a right to legislate guns in the way the did (through the interstate commerce clause). The appeals court agreed. The government appealed the appeals court decision to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court affirmed the appeals court ruling in a 5-4 decision (essentially overturning Lopez' conviction) saying that while Congress has broad powers under the commerce clause, that power was not limitless.
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-v-lopez
Korematsu v. United States
The US won
United States v. Lopez, 514 US 549 (1995)AnswerJustice Thomas voted with the majority to overturn the federal Gun-Free Zone Act of 1990 as unconstitutional.ExplanationIn Lopez, the US Supreme Court overturned the federal Gun-Free Zone Act of 1990 as an unconstitutional use of the Interstate Commerce Clause. In the opinion of the Court, Congress overstepped its constitutional authority by attempting to pass legislation regulating public schools, traditionally a state's rights issue. Congress was unable to convince the Court that there was a legitimate connection between the legislation and commerce between the states.MajorityChief Justice William Rehnquist (wrote opinion of the Court)Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorJustice Antonin ScaliaJustice Anthony KennedyJustice Clarence ThomasDissentingJustice Stephen BreyerJustice John Paul StevensJustice David SouterJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
US v. Eichman, (1990), wasn't heard in the US Court of Appeals. Under the terms of the Flag Protection Act, any failed challenge to the Act went directly from US District Court to the US Supreme Court, bypassing the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. There was no Court of Appeals decision because they didn't get to handle the case.Case Citation:United States v. Eichman, 496 US 310 (1990)For more information, see Related Links, below.
Gibbons v. Ogden was argued before the US Supreme Court on February 5, 1924, and the Court released its decision on March 2, 1824. Gibbons established Congress had sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
The Supreme Court held that Congress could not regulate firearms in school zones as it did not affect interstate commerce.