The traditional definition of non-violence may best be provided
by Jesus in Matthew 5: "That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall
smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also."
Both Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. implemented
this approach to violence in grand fashion, assembling large
gatherings of people in parades and marches, which were greeted
by police violence. When this violence came, they did not
respond violently, and many were injured.
The Dalai Lama in Tibet offers another example. When his
temples were being overrun by the Chinese army, he chose
to flee rather than fight to preserve them.
But there is another approach to the concept of non-violence.
This approach comes from the martial art Aikido, as I was
taught it.
I was taught that each person has a right to a sacred space
around their body. If someone goes to punch you, you have
a right to prevent them from hurting you.
Aikido teaches you to meet an incoming attack with enough
force to redirect and neutralize the attack, doing the least
amount of damage to *yourself*, those around you, and
the attacker as well. This takes tremendous skill, practice,
and awareness.
How does this differ from the "turn the other cheek" approach
to non-violence? If we apply Jesus' philosophy, and the
attacker hits us twice, we are allowing violence to occur:
to ourselves! Is this truly non-violent?
In the Aiki example, we are meeting forceful energy with
forceful energy, and if it is done skillfully, *no-one* will
be injured. One will dissolve the violent energy before
it has a chance to create pain.
Every time I see violence, two images flash through
my mind: the Dalai Lama, and the Aikido master.
It is never clear to me which is the most non-violent.
Gandhi saw nonviolence as a powerful tool that could be used by both the weak and the strong. He believed in the concept of active nonviolent resistance as a way to confront injustice and bring about social change peacefully. Gandhi demonstrated that nonviolence requires great strength and courage to stand firm in the face of adversity.
Gandhi believed that nonviolence was a powerful method that could be used by both the weak and strong. He saw it as a moral force that had the capacity to transform conflicts and bring about social change, regardless of one's physical strength or status. Gandhi demonstrated through his own actions that nonviolence required great courage and inner strength.
No, peace and nonviolence are timeless values that are still important and relevant today. In the face of conflict and unrest, promoting peace and nonviolence can help build understanding, resolve disputes, and create a more harmonious society. It is through peaceful means that sustainable solutions to global challenges can be achieved.
Quakers who wouldn't fight were called conscientious objectors. This belief stems from their commitment to nonviolence and a refusal to participate in war or military service.
Nonviolence was ultimately a more effective strategy for eliminating slavery. Movements like the Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrated the power of peaceful resistance in bringing about systemic change and ending institutionalized slavery. Violence tended to escalate conflicts and hinder long-term progress towards abolition.
In school i took a course about nonviolence
Nonviolence International was created in 1989.
It is acceptable to spell "nonviolence" both with and without a hyphen.
Wonderful topic, but that isn't a question. What are you asking about nonviolence?
they believed in nonviolence and equality
Palestinian Centre for the Study of Nonviolence was created in 1983.
what is the answer???
Dr. King learn about nonviolence from Mohandas Gandhi when he went to visit India.
In the 1960s Joan Baez started The Institute for the Study of Nonviolence, which is now called the Resource Center for Nonviolence.
Charles E. Collyer has written: 'Nonviolence' -- subject(s): Nonviolence, Study and teaching 'Nonviolence ; Origins and Outcomes' 'Analysis of variance' -- subject(s): Analysis of variance, Psychometrics
peace
Gandhi