0
Why are smaller states important in the electoral process, despite having fewer electors compared to larger states?
Smaller states are important in the electoral process because they have a significant impact on the outcome of elections. Even though they have fewer electors compared to larger states, their votes can still make a difference in close races and can influence the overall result. This is because every state, regardless of size, plays a role in determining the final outcome of the election.
What else can I help you with?
What was the alleged corrupt bargain between Adams and clay for the presidency in 1824?
The alleged deal was that Adams appointed Clay his Secretary of State in exchange for Clay's persuading the Congressmen from the states he had won to vote for Adams and make him president when the House decided the election of 1824 after no man received a majority in the electoral college.
What are the differences in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses?
Crack cocaine offenses typically result in harsher sentences compared to powder cocaine offenses. This is due to the sentencing disparities that have historically existed in the criminal justice system, with crack cocaine offenses being punished more severely despite both substances being chemically similar.
Who called the election of 1824 a corrupt bargain why?
Andrew Jackson called the election of 1824 a corrupt bargain because John Quincy Adams was awarded the presidency by the House of Representatives despite not having won the popular vote or the electoral college majority. Jackson believed that Adams had made a backroom deal with Henry Clay, who was the Speaker of the House at the time, to secure the presidency.
What is the difference between affranchis and french aristocrats in saint domingue's?
Affranchis were free people of color in Saint-Domingue who were of mixed race and held a lower social status compared to French aristocrats, who were white colonial landowners and elite members of society. French aristocrats had political power and economic dominance, while affranchis faced discrimination and limitations on their rights despite being free.
Why did democracy survive in some countries despite facing challenges and threats?
Democracy survived in some countries despite challenges and threats because of strong institutions, a commitment to democratic values, active citizen participation, and a willingness to adapt and evolve in response to changing circumstances.
Why was the 23rd amendment important?
Twenty Third Amendment does is to give votes for President and Vice President in the Electoral College to the District of Columbia which equals the least number of votes that any State could have.
What is the role of the electoral college in election procedure When has the winner of the popular vote failed to win the presidency?
It is possible that a candidate could win the national popular vote total but lose the electoral vote total. However, the electoral vote of every state accurately reflects the popular vote within that state. The role of each elector in the electoral college is to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in the elector's individual state.
What happens when somebody is elected for president and doesn't have enough electoral votes?
When nobody receives votes from more than half of the electors, the U.S. House of Representatives elects the President from among the top three presidential candidates with the most electoral votes, and the U.S. Senate elects the Vice President from between the top two vice-presidential candidates with the most electoral votes. That's how John Quincy Adams got elected in 1825 despite being less popular and receiving fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson, and the same rules are still in effect today.
What if faithless elector vote for Romney despite Obama winning election?
This is theoretically possible, and at some points in history, so-called "faithless electors" did in fact break their own pledge to vote for a certain candidate, and instead voted for someone else; some sources say that this has happened with presidential electors more than 150 times over the centuries, but it did not affect the final outcome. Such exceptions are rare, however, since it has become a custom that when a state awards its electoral votes to a presidential candidate, the expectation is the electors will cast their (largely symbolic) votes for that person; many electors are selected by their political party, so they understand how the procedure is supposed to work, and most go along with it. Interestingly, there are twenty-one states in which the electors are not obligated to do that. I enclose a link to a thorough list of state laws about electors, and which ones are not bound by anything other than custom or tradition.
Why do you think that despite such limits Athens is still admired as an early model of democracy?
Athens became a genuine democracy - the citizens in assembly made the decisions and the council carried them out. Compared to this, today's representative democracies elect politicians, who do what they want, rather than what the electors want.
What role did the electoral college make in the 2000 election?
George Bush became president because of the vote in the electoral college, despite not winning a plurality of the popular vote
How did George W. Bush win the 2000 election despite losing the popular?
He won the electoral vote.
Who actually votes for the presidential and vice presidential candidates?
The President (and Vice President, who shares a "ticket") is not directly elected. People vote for the "electors" of their State, who together form the "electoral college". The Electoral College does not meet in one place, but electors meet at their State Capitol. Each State has a number of electors equal to the number of congressmen it has (at least 3, the maximum is California, which has 55). The District of Columbia, which is not a State, also has 3 electors. The Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates with the most votes win. Electors are usually members of a political party who do not hold political office. In theory, they should vote as they please, but in practice, the electors are effectively a point-scoring system. This technically means that a candidate can win without getting the most votes, so the system has been an ongoing controversy. This happened in 2000, when George Bush won the election despite the fact that Al Gore got 0.5 million more votes. Actually, Al Gore would have won the election they'd bothered to recount the votes in Florida properly. In 2004, Bush won 3 million more votes than John Kerry and a narrow majority of electoral votes. But if 60,000 people in Ohio had voted for Kerry, Kerry would have won Ohio and with it the election.
How did George W. Bush win 2000 election despite losing popular vote?
He won the electoral vote.
Was the last person to lose the election in the Electoral College despite winning most of the popular vote?
Al Gore
How many electoral votes did george mcgovern get in 1972?
George McGovern received 17 electoral votes in the 1972 presidential election. Despite not winning the majority of electoral votes, he was able to secure the popular vote in Massachusetts and the District of Columbia.
What 20th century elections were decided by electoral college?
Some notable 20th century elections that were ultimately decided by the electoral college include the 1960 presidential election between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, where Kennedy won by a small margin in the electoral college despite a close popular vote, and the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, which resulted in a controversial Supreme Court ruling and Bush winning the electoral college despite losing the popular vote.
