Because they served their political and economical objectives throughout the region (allowing American companies on their soil, while preventing communist or socialist regimes to rise).
American politicians supported corrupt regimes in Latin America during the Cold War as part of their strategy to prevent the spread of communism in the region. They saw these regimes as bulwarks against leftist movements, even if they were authoritarian and engaged in corrupt practices. Additionally, there were economic interests and geopolitical considerations that influenced their support for these regimes.
The Cold War heightened tensions in Latin America as the US and Soviet Union sought to expand their spheres of influence. This led to political instability, military coups, and civil wars in several countries in the region as they became battlegrounds for ideological conflicts. The US supported anti-communist regimes, leading to human rights abuses and social unrest in many Latin American countries.
This quote highlights how both those in power and those under power can be corrupted by fear: those in power may become oppressive to maintain their control, while those under power may act deceitfully or subserviently to avoid punishment. It underscores the destructive influence of fear in relationships involving power dynamics.
Yes, when socialism is taken to its extreme, where there is complete government control over the economy and society, it often transitions into authoritarianism. In an authoritarian socialist system, individual freedoms and rights are restricted as the government exerts total control over all aspects of life.
Totalitarianism seeks to control all aspects of public and private life, including thoughts and beliefs, while authoritarianism focuses on maintaining political power and control without necessarily intrusive interference into personal lives. Totalitarian regimes tend to have a single ruling party, extensive use of propaganda, and a charismatic leader, whereas authoritarian regimes may allow for some level of opposition or limited political pluralism.
There are 123 countries in the world that are considered to be democracies. These countries have varying degrees of democratic practices and institutions.
According to the Economist magazine: 117 Jordan 3.93 Authoritarian regimes 118 Mauritania 3.91 Authoritarian regimes 119 Egypt 3.89 Authoritarian regimes 120 Morocco 3.88 Authoritarian regimes 121 Rwanda 3.71 Authoritarian regimes 122 Burkina Faso 3.60 Authoritarian regimes 123 Comoros 3.58 Authoritarian regimes 124 Nigeria 3.53 Authoritarian regimes 125 Cuba 3.52 Authoritarian regimes 126 Cameroon 3.46 Authoritarian regimes 127 Kazakhstan 3.45 Authoritarian regimes 128 Niger 3.41 Authoritarian regimes 129 Kuwait 3.39 Authoritarian regimes 130 Bahrain 3.38 Authoritarian regimes 131 Angola 3.35 Authoritarian regimes 132 Belarus 3.34 Authoritarian regimes 133 Algeria 3.32 Authoritarian regimes 134 Côte d'Ivoire 3.27 Authoritarian regimes 135 Azerbaijan 3.19 Authoritarian regimes 136 China 3.04 Authoritarian regimes 137 Swaziland 3.04 Authoritarian regimes 138 Afghanistan 3.02 Authoritarian regimes 139 Gabon 3.00 Authoritarian regimes 140 Oman 2.98 Authoritarian regimes 141 Tunisia 2.96 Authoritarian regimes 142 Yemen 2.95 Authoritarian regimes 143 Congo 2.94 Authoritarian regimes 144 Qatar 2.92 Authoritarian regimes 145 Iran 2.83 Authoritarian regimes 146 Sudan 2.81 Authoritarian regimes 147 United Arab Emirates 2.60 Authoritarian regimes 148 Zimbabwe 2.53 Authoritarian regimes 149 Vietnam 2.53 Authoritarian regimes 150 Tajikistan 2.45 Authoritarian regimes 151 Togo 2.43 Authoritarian regimes 152 Djibouti 2.37 Authoritarian regimes 153 Eritrea 2.31 Authoritarian regimes 154 Republic of the Congo 2.28 Authoritarian regimes 155 Equatorial Guinea 2.19 Authoritarian regimes 156 Syria 2.18 Authoritarian regimes 157 Laos 2.10 Authoritarian regimes 158 Guinea 2.09 Authoritarian regimes 159 Libya 2.00 Authoritarian regimes 160 Guinea-Bissau 1.99 Authoritarian regimes 161 Saudi Arabia 1.90 Authoritarian regimes 162 Central African Republic 1.86 Authoritarian regimes 163 Myanmar 1.77 Authoritarian regimes 164 Uzbekistan 1.74 Authoritarian regimes 165 Turkmenistan 1.72 Authoritarian regimes 166 Chad 1.52 Authoritarian regimes 167 North Korea 0.86 Authoritarian regimes
There seems to have been a deep-seated yearning for a 'strong man', a loathing of democratic politicians (parliamentarians) and an utter horror of Bolshevism.
This quote highlights how both those in power and those under power can be corrupted by fear: those in power may become oppressive to maintain their control, while those under power may act deceitfully or subserviently to avoid punishment. It underscores the destructive influence of fear in relationships involving power dynamics.
Very much so. It would benefit them if they did. Many were fleeing from unfriendly regimes.
A Spanish colony. Almost all of South America was under various European colonial regimes for a couple of centuries or more.
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
A. van Wambeke has written: 'Calculated soil moisture and temperature regimes of South America' -- subject(s): Soil moisture, Soil temperature, Soils 'Calculated soil moisture and temperature regimes of Africa' -- subject(s): Maps, Measurement, Soil moisture, Soil temperature, Soils 'Soil moisture and temperature regimes of Central America, Caribbean, Mexico (SMSS technical monograph)' 'Management properties of ferralsols' -- subject(s): Ferralsols, Red soils, Soils
Europeans migrated to North America for many reasons. Examples of which are:* Better economic opportunities;* To escape from religious persecution;* To escape from repressive regimes in Europe; and* The desire to live in a democratic nation.
Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes was created in 2007.
Totalitarian regimes, dictatorships, and despotism.
These were based on ethnicity, thus prompting racism in the colonial regimes throughout Latin America. As a result of this, even today the whiter a person is, the more power and privileges are associated to him/her.
Governments.