answersLogoWhite

0

It was the time of the writing of the Constitution. The Democrat-republicans wanted to hang onto the Articles of Confederation. They feared a larger, central powered federal government. Patrick Henry believed it was an attempt by the Federalists to do away with slavery. To a degree, he was correct.

Financially, the country was on the verge of bankruptcy, still having to pay the debt of the Revolutionary War and with no military to speak of, was being pressed further by the rampant piracy, kidnappings and demands for ransom taking place in the Mediterranean. Washington's hands were tied, all he could do was pay the demanded ransoms and hope that it would all end soon. As "President" he had very limited power and again, with no military, could not afford an international incident.

Hamilton suggested that the federal government fund a military to deal with such issues and also proposed that the country open itself up to foreign commerce. The Democrat-republicans balked. Jefferson, suggested that each state commit some of its militias to the cause of protecting our merchant ships. He was also opposed to the notion of foreign commerce. The states refused to commit troops. Jefferson then proposed (as if it were his idea) that the federal government produce a military.

When Jefferson finally realized the dire situation of the finances, he agreed that we should open trade negotiations. Hamilton pushed to do business with England. Jefferson was appalled. In his mind, the English were still our enemy. Instead, he suggested we do business with France. Trouble was, France was in the midst of a bloody revolution. Jefferson was willing to turn a blind eye to the wanton bloodshed and disregard for personal property.

Hamilton sent John Jay to England to negotiate a treaty to do business with them AND to get protection from the English Navy for U.S. merchant ships plying their trade in the Med.. What Jay returned with was far less than desirable. To say the least, it heavily favored the English. Jefferson openly accused Washington who signed off on the treaty, of treason. In fact, Jefferson REPEATEDLY openly accused Washington of treason.

The accusations wore him down and eventually, Washington announced that he would leave office. He wrote his Farewell Address to the nation and it was Hamilton who reworded it. In the original draft, Washington made clear mention of Jefferson, the accusations and the French (who had spies in this country looking to overthrow the fledgling government). Washington intended to warn the nation about Jefferson and his alliances with the French but Hamilton softened the rhetoric and reworded it so as to not come off as sour grapes. Instead of "...entanglements with the French" it became simply "foreign entanglements." And the same holds with his comments about political parties.

Source(s):BA in History

"Dangerous Nation" by Prof. Robert Kagan, copyright 2006, Alfred A. Knopf (publisher)

User Avatar

Abbie Botsford

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is Washington's position or political parties?

Washington was against having political parties. He could see that they were divisive and created disunity in the country.


Why didn't George Washington warn against political parties?

Washington did warn against political parties. He was very persistent in saying they were bad for our nation's growth.


Who thought political parties were bad for the government?

George Washington is noted for warning against political parties.


Which leader was against the formation of political parties?

George Washington spoke out against them in his farewell address.


Is it true that George Washington favored the system of political parties?

Actually George Washington was extremely against the use of the political system. Washington himself didn't involve himself in a political party and in his farewell address, he warned against the political party system and stressed that the United States should stay neutral in order to survive.


What was George Washington's political affiliations?

George Washington was a "Federalist," although in his time, there weren't clear-cut political parties. Washington himself was set against any divisions brought on by political parties.


What leader warned Americans that political parties may have harmful effects?

George Washington was strongly against America dividing into two different political parties. In his farewell address, he wanted the people of his nation to be united, and he felt that political parties would turn his nation against each other. He also warned against foreign entanglements.


Washington was enthusiastic about political powers?

Actually, no. He cautioned against political parties and didn't belong to one.


Did George Washington favor any political party?

He did not favor any political party. In fact, he warned against political parties in his farewell address, saying that they could lead to intense factionalization that could divide the country.


What political party read into the Constitution?

In 1789 there were no political parties. In fact Washington warned about the formation of parties and how they would put their interests before the common good of the people. Looks like he was right.


What leader was against the formation of the political parties?

ya boi George Washington


Why did George Washington advise against political parties?

Why was Jefferson opposed against polictical parties? Actually it was Washington who was opposed to political parties. Jefferson helped start a new party to oppose the Federalist. Jefferson was in essence in favor of them instead of opposed to them.