Dangerous. Privatized Social Security means the contributions would be paid to, and the funds managed by, one or more private investment firms, rather than managed by (and backed by) the federal government. The investment company would be run on a for-profit basis (which the federal government does not do), meaning investors would make money from ordinary workers' contributions, a practice with a built-in conflict of interest detrimental to the worker.
If Social Security had been privatized when the Stock Market crashed in 2008, it would have been disastrous.
For more information see Related Questions and Related Links, below.
YES
socialism.
Socialism advocates for public rather than private control of property. It believes that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole, rather than by private individuals.
There can be no such thing. Socialism (classless stateless society based on production for use) cannot be mixed with any other system.
False, communism when actually employed in government is much more controlling than standard socialism. Communism is an extreme version of socialism. Under communism, private ownership, private property & business ownership is forbidden. Fascism is a less extreme version of socialism. Under Fascism, business & property ownership is allowed but controlled & directed by the government.
Capitalism: free enterprise and private ownership Communism: high taxes, no private property Socialism: same as communism)
socialism
Communism is an extreme form of socialism and permits no private property.
Communism
Capitalism and socialism both respect private property. Communism is a form of socialism where all 'means of production' are publicly owned--that is factories, farms, mines, etc. But socialism itself respects property rights. Capitalism, when it runs amuck as it has in the US, tends to see property rights as being above human rights or civil rights. Because the rues are dictated by the property-rich. But putting property above people is not inherent in capitalism, usually.
Communism
No. While the United States government is espousing policies further to the left of what had been a decade earlier, they are a far cry from Socialism and are often trying to seek capitalism and private ownership with some governmental intervention rather than direct government ownership or management (which would be socialism).