0
What is a seemingly plausible argument that is invalid and misleading?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
sophism sophism
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
One example of a seemingly plausible argument that is invalid and misleading is the fallacy of affirming the consequent. This fallacy occurs when someone assumes that if a certain condition is met (the consequent), then the original statement must be true. However, this does not logically follow, as there could be other factors at play.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is propaganda different from argument?
Propaganda is usually the telling of lies to prove one's assumptions."Logical fallacies" include many categories and refers to an incorrect use of logic.Propaganda is almost always full of logical fallacies.-----------------One of the definitions of Propoganda that I like best is from Professor Randal Marlin of Carleton University in Ottawa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randal_Marlin):The organized attempt through communication to affect belief or action or inculcate attitudes in a large audience in ways that circumvent or suppress an individual's adequately informed, rational, reflective judgmentIn logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is a misconception resulting from incorrect reasoning in argumentation. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (e.g. appeal to emotion), or take advantage of social relationships between people (e.g. argument from authority). Fallacious arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical argument, making fallacies more difficult to diagnose. Also, the components of the fallacy may be spread out over separate arguments.In philosophy, the term logical fallacy properly refers to a formal fallacy: a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument which renders the argument invalid.However, it is often used more generally in informal discourse to mean an argument which is problematic for any reason, and thus encompasses informal fallacies as well as formal fallacies. - valid but unsound claims or bad nondeductive argumentation - .The presence of a formal fallacy in a deductive argument does not imply anything about the argument's premises or its conclusion (see fallacy fallacy). Both may actually be true, or even more probable as a result of the argument (e.g., appeal to authority), but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described. By extension, an argument can contain a formal fallacy even if the argument is not a deductive one; for instance an inductive argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or causality can be said to commit a formal fallacy.Summary:As the first contributor noted Propaganda usually includes fallacies of some sort (erroneous or misleading presentation of information) that skew the facts towards the perspective of the presenter.
Development is a multidimensional concept that cannot be explained Discuss the validity of the statement?
The statement is valid because development encompasses various aspects such as economic, social, political, and environmental factors. These dimensions interact with each other and influence the overall progress of a society. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of development requires considering its multidimensional nature.
What is the use of cantraints?
Constraints are used to enforce rules and limitations on the data that can be stored in a database table. They help ensure data integrity by preventing invalid or inconsistent data from being added to the database. Common types of constraints include primary key, foreign key, unique, and check constraints.
Why do some men treat women like their opinions are invalid?
Some men may treat women's opinions as invalid due to deep-rooted societal beliefs about gender roles and power dynamics that have perpetuated inequality. This behavior can also be influenced by personal insecurities, lack of empathy, or a desire to maintain control. Engaging in open dialogue, education, and advocating for gender equality can help address and challenge such behavior.
What does it mean when a person cannot answer a simple yes or no question They answer elaborately but still not answering the question?
They might fear offending you, or they might not be sure, or it is possible that a simple answer doesn't actually mean anything in this case. For instance, if you ask a man who has never abused his family, "Have you stopped beating your wife?," a simple yes or no answer isn't sufficient. He needs to present more context and help you understand that the question itself is invalid.
What is theWord for a plausible argument that is invalid and misleading?
sophism
What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
What does so do in Spanish?
your argument is invalid
What is an invalid argument?
In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.
Can an argument be invalid and sound?
No, but it can be unsound and valid.
What word means illogical argument?
Invalid.
Is the Liverpool are the best?
STOKE is the best your argument is invalid
What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
That would be a moot point
What is the difference of invalid and unsound argument?
the invalid argument is argument which is not based on any justification to justify the argument. Whereas, unsound argument is based on little justification but does not fully match with the ground on which the argument is based
A valid argument can be made invalid if it cotains?
poor wording ???
What is the difference between an unsound argument and an invalid argument?
An invalid argument does not make sense logically. The statements in the argument are not connected in a rational way. A sound argument must not only be valid (logically connected) but also based on true premises. Therefore an argument may be unsound because it makes no logical sense, because the premises are flawed, or both.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
