Because in reality authority is an idea, there isn't any magical constraint on your life your here for a short time and then your gone forever. It wouldn't be to bad if your views aligned with whichever system of control you happen to appear in; but what if they don't. You wanna know what happens when they don't? People come in your house at night and either kill you or completely isolate you from your family and friends for however long they see fit.
Some people understand this so they decide to be in control of themselves. I don't blame them, because Im gonna do whatever I want with my body and my space and if someone tries to stop me then that would be the only reason I see fit to step outside my boundaries.
Inform yourself and think for yourself and of course resist authority.
thats my 2 cents
The characteristic of "hostility toward authority figures" is often expressed as anger toward authority figures in delinquent subcultures, as individuals in these subcultures resist and challenge the rules and norms set by authority figures.
Individuals who compromise their own ethics to obey authority in the Milgram Experiment can be held responsible for the treatment of another because they ultimately chose to follow orders that caused harm. Despite the pressure from authority figures, individuals have the free will to question and resist unethical commands. By choosing to prioritize authority over their own moral compass, they contribute to the mistreatment of others.
Well, narcissists love themselves, so it is hard to recognize anyone else's authority over them. They might have a problem (as most people do, actually) with anyone who uses their authority to make rules or decisions that they disagree with.
Ignoring the situation completely and pretending it doesn't exist is not an effective way to resist unspoken peer pressure. This can lead to feelings of isolation and may not address the issue at hand.
Stanley Milgram's experiment investigated the effect of authority on people's willingness to do unethical things, stemming from the experiences of the Holocaust. I think his hypothesis was that if people are pressured by a person of authority to do something, they will do it, even if it is against their moral code.
"Rebels" is a countable noun as it can be pluralized and used with a specific number. It refers to people who resist or defy authority or control.
Rebellious means to show a desire to resist authority or control
The root word of "defiant" is "defy," which means to resist or challenge authority or rules.
There is no such thing. If one is being incited to resist, the authority is NOT lawful. Incitement to resist implies the unlawful act of stirring up anger with a reflexive physical response of violent energy that's intended to be unleashed against a person or group of persons having authority. Resisting arrest is one thing, then there's an incitement of resistance by the authority, which is UNLAWFUL.
People find it difficult to resist your persuasive manner
The correct spelling is "rebellion" (action against authority).
cause
cause
The Zealots were a party among the Jews (so called from their zeal for the law) who were determined to resist Roman or any foreign authority in Palestine.
The word 'rebellious' is an adjective, a word that describes a noun as fighting against or disobeying authority, showing a desire to resist authority or convention.
People resisted the holocaust by leaving the area or by hiding. Some people did fight back but very few were armed and most were unable to resist.
use armed force to help Middle East nations resist Communist aggression.