Mother Teresa lived in India, particularly Calcutta. She was a Sister of the Missionaries of Charity (that's why she always wore white with blue stripes) and she was a Catholic.
She took care of the sick, the dying and the poor. It did not matter if they had anything from a cold to leprosy, she would take them, bathe them, feed them and love them.
She made every attempt to have others treat these people as they should be: as human. One of her most famous quotes is: " It is not what we do, but how much love we put into doing it". Of couse there are always others who dont agree and this being the internet, such opinions can always be found. Try the book review below by '''John M. Swomley.
'''
Clemens Neumann Nathan has written: 'The changing face of religion and human rights' -- subject(s): Human rights, Religion and law, Religion and state, Freedom of religion, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Human rights
There is a universal charter for human rights orchestered by the United Nation Council but there is no universal charter for religion. Different religion abuse human rights due to their different fundemental. For example: A woman or a nurse or a teacher covers her mouth when speaking due to her religion obligation which she perceive it is her rights but... what about the rights of the person she is speaking to, the patient she is attending to or the student she is teaching to?.
A:Not in a liberal democracy. All we need to do is defend the human rights of all, regardless of religion or lack of religion. As long as this applies without fear or favour, then Christians and non-Christians alike will have their human rights respected.
None if you believe in freedom of religion. In that case they're parallel.
In every nation there are some laws that can described as "human rights' laws, but there is no such codified document encompassing "Human Rights" and every society, every religion, and every nationality views them differently.
Mother Teresa was not a champion of human rights. She ran a number of hospices for poor people in India, but her main concern seems to have been to convert people to Catholicism before they died. If the apparently well-informed claim is true that she had dying patients baptised without their informed consent or knowledge, then she was responsible for an abuse of human rights.
Right to have big properties and right to believe a religion.
Never Women are given all their rights per Islam religion and are so much respected and apraciated. Islam religion is the first religion and first law that secured women human rights even before the UN human rights laws. Islam religion; for the first time in history; secured for the woman to have the rights to select her husband, to do business, to have her own properties, to have share in inheritance, to be divorced upon her choice, to sign contracts,... etc
Yes they have . _____________________________________ Islam is the first God religion that assured Women human rights; even before the UN.
I can't really disagree with your characterization of the nature of religion. Yes, religion is included in human rights but it isn't always defined as freedom of religion rather it is describe as "freedom of conscience" to include even those who have no believe in a divine being who runs the show. Atheists, agnostics, etc are included.
Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our race, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, religion, language, or any other status. We are all equally entitled to our human rights. Although the concept of human rights understands those rights to be universal, any person’s enjoyment of human rights flows from the political system under which they live. They come from the legal system, economic system and the cultural systems of any given country.
Because religions want to control peoples lives and if they are given full human rights they might do things their religion says is wrong.