answersLogoWhite

0

The Book of Deuteronomy is believed to be the Book of Law that was said to have been found in the Temple during the reign of King Josiah - around 622 BCE. Many scholars believe that the book was actually written at this time, but placed in the Temple, to be found, so as to lend antiquity to it. In fact, the Book of Deuteronomy clearly has the same style as the books of the Deuteronomic history, written around the time of Josiah, and used the same relatively modern Hebrew.

Deuteronomy was written by Moses to record the message he gave to the Israelites just prior to their entry into the promised land of Canaan. The word itself in Greek deuteronomos means literally 'second law' , since this was the second time the law had been given to the Israelites. This was the 'new generation' who had arisen after their parents refused to enter Canaan due to unbelief and Deuteronomy is like a renewing of the covenant between God and Israel.

The end of the book contains an epitaph about the death of Moses which obviously was added later, but there is increasing concensus about the facts supporting Mosaic authorship of this document.

The ideas developed in the 19th century by Graf, Wellhausen, Kuenen and others regarding the date of authorship are now thoroughly discredited in terms of any factual base. The idea that writing was not in use in Moses time led the proponents of this theory to propose a later date for its authorship as mentioned above. This has been thoroughly refuted by archaeological discoveries which show that writing was widespread even in the time of Abraham centuries before Moses.

Another presuppositional reason for putting Deuteronomy into the time of Josiah was the mistaken idea that religion in Israel and elsewhere took an evolutionary path from primitive polytheism (many gods) through to Henotheism (one chief god among many) to Monotheism (one true God). Thus, according to this mistaken view Israel's religion followed this path and 'could not' (they stated it as plainly as that) have had such a view of God at such an early stage in their history. Mistaken is an appropraite term (as used by scholars in referring to this theory) since Archaeology has demonstrated that Monotheism was early, that Israel did not go through the alleged evolution in their religion and that even other nearby cultures descended into polytheism after an earlier Monotheism not the other way around.

In addition to this there are a number of clear cultural and historical incongruities which are not explained by Deuteronomy being put into the time of Josiah, which are explained when it is placed in its proper historical and literary time period in Moses' time. Deuteronomy simply does not fit into the time of Josiah and only the entirely subjective criteria (so-called by scholars) of Wellhausen and the other theorists could place it there.

Further to all this it is worth noting that outside of The Bible there is not one shred of historical or textual evidence of any kind for the existence of the alleged writer of Deuteronomy in the time of Josiah. There is also not one single shred of textual evidence for the existence of the document refered to as the Deuteronomic history. Needless to say, there is no real evidence inside the Bible either. So, it is a complete fabrication to purport to compare an existent document with a fictional one. It gives a degree of credibility to the Deuteronomic history which it clearly does not deserve. Scholars have long recognized the possibility both today and in the ancient past for authors to use different styles as occasions demand, and so there is no reason whatsoever to even propose the existence of such a history.

Archaeological evidence also thoroughly refutes the false assertion regarding differences in Hebrew according to time of writing. Terms previously thought to be later have been found earlier. This is another example of a false theory refuted by facts. The real facts actually point in the opposite direction to the theory.

To put it very simply, Moses wrote Deuteronomy around 1400 BC prior to the Israelites entering Canaan, a momentous event in their history which he was not himself to participate in. There was no fraudulent placing in the temple to give an 'appearance of antiquity'. It was actually and factually ancient but had not been followed. Scholars have also determined that authors were able to use different literary styles as the occasion required. We do this even today. Moses was no exception.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the Deuteronomic Historian's view of Solomon in the Old Testament?

The Deuteronomist portrayed David and Solomon in a very positive light, as they were believed to be the ancestors of the royal family of Judah, right down to his own time. In fact, the Chronicler, apparently rewriting the Deuteronomic History, downplayed the enthusiasm of the Deuteronomic History a little.


What is a book of history in the Bible?

1 Kings and 2 Kings are part of the series now known as the Deuteronomic History and are moderately reliable in their history. The Deuteronomic History consists of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings.1 Chronicles and 2 Chronicles are also considered history books, but are possibly less reliable than the Deuteronomic History on which they are based, because that original source was amended without reliance on any other known source.


What questions did the Deuteronomic history attempt to answer?

A:The term 'Deuteronomic History' refers to the Books of Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings. These form an integrated block of text covering the period from the conquest of Canaan through to the end of the monarchy. Unlike the Pentateuch, the Deuteronomic History does not really attempt to answer questions so much as attempt to provide a history of the Jews, largely using a Judahite perspective and more or less asserting the existence of a Yahweh-only faith throughout the period covered. The Books of 1 and 2 Chronicles were written after the Babylonian Exile, based on the Deuteronomic History but with changes to suit the political and theological realities of the time.


What is the Chronicles book about?

The Book of Chronicles is another history that more or less parallels the rather earlier Deuteronomic history, but presents the priestly point of view. Scholars say that it was written shortly after the Babylonian Exile, using the Deuteronomic history for its source. Chronicles attempts to resolve some of the inconsistencies found in the Deuteronomic history and introduces new theological concepts by placing them in a pre-Exilic context. For example, the notion of Satan entered Judaism during the Exile, and 1 Chronicles 21:1 says, "And Satan stood up against Israel and provoked David to number Israel." Because Kings (part of the Deuteronomic history) was written before the Exile, the corresponding passage contains no mention of Satan. The anonymous author of Chronicles is now referred to as the Chronicler.


In what section of the Bible is 1 Kings found?

1 Kings is in the Old Testament. It is part of what is now known as the Deuteronomic History.


Do the Hebrew scriptures present the history of the Israelites?

AnswerAlmost all histories are subjective, particularly histories written in ancient times before modern standards of historical scholarship were defined. Within this limitation, the Deuteronomic History (Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings), written in the time of King Josiah, provides one view of the history of Israel and Judah. The Book of Chronicles, written after the Babylonian Exile, provides a noticeably different of the history of Israel and Judah, but was clearly based on information taken from the Deuteronomic History.


What time period was the Deuteronomic history?

None, since the hypothesis which proposed such a history is assumed to be false in terms of the pillars upon which it rests, in terms of its main premises. Deuteronomy and the history surrounding it belongs in the Exodus period, as written, around 1400 BC. The Deuteronomist, for whom there has never been any actual evidence, although that person was such a great writer never existed.


What are the major unifying themes of the Deuteronomic History?

The Deuteronomic History consists of the Old Testament Books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel anf Kings, which form a unified and consistent history of the land of the Israelite people.Whether or not it is a strictly literal history, the Deuteronomic History certainly provides an epic theme of a glorious past for a great nation founded under the guidance of its God and then divided into two by because of the disobedience of its people. One theme that devolves from this is that disobedience of the law will bring punishment by God, particularly the withdrawal of the gift of the land promised to the people by God.Perhaps the past was not as glorious as described; perhaps the land was not really promised to the people just as described; and perhaps there really was no magnificant United Monarchy of Israel, but the History was designed to develop national pride and unity, both for the Judahites of the southern kingdom and the refugees who arrived in Judah after the destruction of the northern Hebrew kingdom of Israel.


Who is the Old testament scholar noted for formulating the theory of a Deuteronomistic History?

The term "Deuteronomistic History" was first used by Martin Noth in 1943. He argued that there was an underlying unity in language and cultural content from the Book of Deuteronomy to 2 Kings. In modern usage, it is also called the Deuteronomic History.


Where is the book of II Kings placed in the Bible?

A:Biblical scholars tend to group the books of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings together under the name, Deuteronomic History. These books form a well-integrated set that scholars regard as originating from the same source late in the Judahite monarchical period, but extensively redacted later. Second Kings is the last book in the Deuteronomic History and is followed by 1 Chronicles.


To whom can you compare King David?

A:Little is known about King David. The Deuteronomic History (Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings) was written as far removed in time from King David as a modern history would be removed from King Arthur. The story of David and Goliath, in the Deuteronomic History but omitted from Chronicles, bears parallels to the story of King Arthur and Excalibur. In both cases, the hero was able to demonstrate ability where all othersa had failed. And both went on to become great kings in tradition.


1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings make up what?

1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings, along with the Books of Joshua and Judges, make up what is now known as the Deuteronomic History.