NO No NO sattis are not rajputs .kotli and murree was part of kashmir which was ruled by dogras with 22 small princels states in them .6 of them were ruled by muslims rajputs . kotli and poonch were ruled by mangral rajputs .there is no shajra nasab of sattis there is no name of them in history . in 1931 cences of british India each rajput tribe was described brifely and in rawalpindi too each rajput trbie was mention . sattis them selves didnt mention themselves as rajput and even they dont do it now..sattis are not rajputs .
As per my knowledge, "taprial" is not a recognized sub-caste of Rajputs. It is possible that it may be a regional or local community that is not widely known or acknowledged within the broader Rajput community.
not at alll..sodha belongs to very high clan of rajput and are upper caste but these days many no-rajput caste also uses sodha as their surname mostly in rajasthan and they fall in obc catagory...but all origianal rajput sodha are biggest and wealthiest rajput clan of mewar district of rajasthan and sindh as well.......
The Rathod surname is commonly associated with the Rajput community in Rajasthan, not specifically with the Scheduled Caste Koli community. Rajputs are considered an upper caste in the traditional caste system of India.
Both Tomar and Bhadoria are sub-castes within the broader Kshatriya varna in the Indian caste system. There is no hierarchy between them in general, as caste hierarchies can vary across regions and communities.
no vashisht is definitely not a sc ... thay are Brahmins.the surname is after maharishi vashisht who was a a famous sage.
No, Rajput Dhobi is not a sub-caste of Rajput. Rajput is a warrior caste in India, traditionally associated with princely states and military service. Dhobi, on the other hand, refers to a sub-caste within the Indian caste system that is traditionally associated with the occupation of washing clothes. These two groups are distinct and not directly related in terms of caste hierarchy or social status.
yes
yes
Jup it is a sub-cast for Rana rajpu
No "ACTUALLY PATKAR CASTE IS SUB-CASTE OF PADMASHALE WEAVING CASTE LIKE NESSI, KURNI, MAHAR, MALASALE, ETC.,"
No, Bhutta is not a sub-caste of Rajput. Bhutta is a common surname found among various communities in India, including Rajputs, Jats, and Gujjars, among others. The use of the surname Bhutta does not determine a person's caste or sub-caste.
yes, origin Guler in Kangra Himachal pradesh.
RAJPUT
As per my knowledge, "taprial" is not a recognized sub-caste of Rajputs. It is possible that it may be a regional or local community that is not widely known or acknowledged within the broader Rajput community.
"Luniya" or "Lunia" is considered a sub-caste within the broader Rajput community in certain regions of India. This sub-caste is known to have specific customs, traditions, and cultural practices that differentiate it from other Rajput groups.
rathore are rajputs they belong rajput cast
Not all Hindus are called Rajputs. Rajput is a sub-caste of Hindu.