answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Not necessarily; social policy would.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

20m ago

Yes, technology has the potential to exacerbate social stratification in the Philippines by widening the digital divide, where those with access to technology and digital skills benefit more than those without. This could lead to unequal opportunities for employment, education, and civic participation. Efforts to bridge this gap through initiatives like digital literacy programs are crucial in addressing this issue.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would technology strengthen social stratification in the Philippines?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the positive effects of social stratification?

it strengthen the ability to have work


What are the different social process in the Philippines?

>stratification >cooperation >amalgamation >differentiation >assimilation >acculturation >competition >conflict


What is the relationship between stratification and technology?

It has been observed that there is relationship between a society's technology and its social stratification. Situating social stratification in a historical perspective will help in understanding why there are varying degrees of inequality worldwide. Simple technology in the hunting and gathering stage provided only what was necessary for day to day living. The group was secured by sharing what people gathered. Social stratification gets more complex in societies with more advance technology. Technological advances create surplus products, thus making social inequality more pronounced. Education gives the individual more opportunities.


What are the causes of social stratification in the Caribbean?

social stratification is the ranking of social groups


What are the determinant of social stratification?

The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.


What are the Approaches in the study of Social Stratification?

Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.


What are the theoretical perspectives of social stratification?

The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.


What are the five basic characteristics of social stratification?

The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification


What are the correlate of global poverty?

social stratification technology population growth gender inequality global power relationships cultural patterns


What view reflects social-conflict theorists' ideas about social stratification?

Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.


Do you believe the structural-functionalist or the social conflict approach best explains social stratification?

I believe that the social conflict approach best explains the social stratification.


Who gain the least from stratification?

The lower classes have the least to gain from social stratification.