Not necessarily; social policy would.
Yes, technology has the potential to exacerbate social stratification in the Philippines by widening the digital divide, where those with access to technology and digital skills benefit more than those without. This could lead to unequal opportunities for employment, education, and civic participation. Efforts to bridge this gap through initiatives like digital literacy programs are crucial in addressing this issue.
it strengthen the ability to have work
social stratification is the ranking of social groups
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
I believe that the social conflict approach best explains the social stratification.
it strengthen the ability to have work
>stratification >cooperation >amalgamation >differentiation >assimilation >acculturation >competition >conflict
It has been observed that there is relationship between a society's technology and its social stratification. Situating social stratification in a historical perspective will help in understanding why there are varying degrees of inequality worldwide. Simple technology in the hunting and gathering stage provided only what was necessary for day to day living. The group was secured by sharing what people gathered. Social stratification gets more complex in societies with more advance technology. Technological advances create surplus products, thus making social inequality more pronounced. Education gives the individual more opportunities.
social stratification is the ranking of social groups
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
social stratification technology population growth gender inequality global power relationships cultural patterns
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
I believe that the social conflict approach best explains the social stratification.
The lower classes have the least to gain from social stratification.