Evolution

Fossils themselves can very rarely be dated by any means...their age is usually judged by the geological assessment of the area and layer in which they are found

the sharing of common ancestors within the species' evolutionary history.

All life is the result of evolution.

they can produce fertile offspring

We often debate the way a baseball should be thrown or that someone wrote in an article that the way to hold a gun when shooting is THIS way not THAT way.
The people who oppose the idea of evolution are those who take the Christian bible literally.
Creationism is a religious belief. It says that all life began all at once just a few thousand years ago and has not changed.
Evolution says no to that view point. The universe is billions of years old and that things changed slowly over time and organisms adapt to survive in those changing environments.
These two will never agree and creationism should be seen in a religious light.

This is the fundamental premise of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection; the environment has a fundamental impact on the adaptations and evolution of organisms. The environment "selects" for those specimens that survive to have more offspring. Those animals that cannot survive are selected against.

Kimura (1968) • The vast majority of evolutionary changes at the molecular level are caused by random drift of selectively neutral mutants (not affecting fitness) ! The Molecular Clock.

Experiments have been done to verify inheritance of acquired characteristics, and results unanimously show that it is false.

Possible nothing. Natural selection produces combinatorial genes that work in amazing ways incrementally. The vertebrate eye, for instance. Naturally, those organisms that do not reproduce successfully are ' edited ', but selection works on the molecular level to make organisms not only fit, but fit enough.

To pit it in a more accurate form; the theory of evolution by natural selection. Not a belief, a theory in the scientific sense.

Good ol' punctuated equilibrium.

natural selection is a passive prosess . the mechanism of some individuals to be selected more than others is because they fit their environment more. and phenotype shows the fitness .

By evolution

Survival of the fittest.

The population is evolving.

Random fertilization. All the eggs and sperm produced are variations due to crossing over alone, not even considering other processes. The meet and fertilization occurs randomly insuring a good mix of genetic variation. Thus, genetic diversity.

Punctuated equilibrium

False

The morphological evidence which is shown in fossils to modern animals supports evolution because some dinosaurs, for instance, had feathers and we can obviously see that trait today in birds. The biochemical evidence, which comes in the form of DNA comparison and amino acid similarities, shows that we related closely to monkeys and pigs, which suggests that we have close ancestors to these animals.

They evolved in response to changing selection pressures (specifically predation by birds) as levels of pollution changed. The pollution reduced the effectiveness of the moths natural camouflage, resulting in the more visible moths being eaten by birds in large quantities, the less visible moths then were the only ones reproducing and their color became dominate in the population.

Evolution of Development Administration?

It is the only theory presented that explains the existence of different species and the different versions/implementations within a species. It is based on various scientific based studies made over time by accepted scientists. All other beliefs are based on religious beliefs, mythology, superstition or suggestions of alien intervention.

Although the evolutionary theories have flaws (many flaws) and contradictory evidence, no other scientific based alternatives have been presented with enough evidence to warrant being accepted and until that occurs, the currently accepted beliefs will prevail, as will the religious beliefs, mythology, superstition and suggestions of alien intervention.

Charles Darwin was not qualified to make such theory, he was a naturalist and as such had a bias against the involvement of supernatural forces thus rendering his conclusions scientifically invalid. His education consisted of parts of the subjects of medicine, taxidermy, plant taxonomy, theology, geology, and few other things that related to the nature of his claims. his assumptions were based off observations he witnessed on the Galapagos Islands and influenced by a book he read on the voyage to the islands. The book stated that a river had carved away at a landscape to form a valley, Darwin believed that other things in the world were formed this way when he saw that there were finches on the islands he saw that they were different from the ones he had known at his home, he also observed that they changed from island to island. The conclusion he drew from this is that these birds must have shared a common ancestor and over time became similar creatures. His reasoning was influenced by the book because he believed that time was "carving" certain creatures into different ones through "evolution" he decided that if finches evolved this was then why not all creatures? The fundamental flaw in his conclusion is that he didn't have the instruments of the modern world and thus couldn't come to the reality that the finches were adaptations of the same creature, because they had lived on the Galapagos islands for a long time they "adapted" to life on the islands instead of the mainland. Darwin himself said "if science should prove me wrong than i am wrong" unfortunately evolution's claims violate several laws of physics, however many people refuse to accept this truth because they simply wish to remove God from life. Darwin studied theology and was actually trained to be a pastor he stated that in no way was his theory meant to usurp the supernatural authority of God, how he was trained to be a pastor AND a naturalist i really don't know.