Attila the Hun

BBBBBIIIIGGG and INTIMIDATING!!!

Actually, Atilla may have been a drawf. He was tall for a dwarf, but stocky and powerfully built, and intimidating. His other features were typical of the Hun, who were Asiatic and related to the Mongols, rather than Germanic as is still believed.

No one knows for sure, but whatever he said to Attila convinced him to not sack Rome.

his army: their called the Hunarians by other nations. but by the frightened people he attacked, his army had nicknames like the "the devils of europe" "the gods neglected runners" "the unknown demons" and "the barbaric slayers of rome" were some of the names they got due to their raping and killin of people

He was savage and barbaric, but there was an article that says he was a forgiving person. An example is, when a man bribed (Attila) head guard to assassinate him, the person who was sent to assassinate him was caught. The person who hired the murderer was found by Attila and he was forgiven. That shows Attila is a peaceful and forgiving person.

Yes... but to his other traitors he would shove a wooden stake through the traitors rectum and had the pole balanced there for 2 days in which the traitor was slowly and gruesomely impaled. Also he went to a church, not to pray, but to behead a bishop. He is NOT peaceful but a horrible, terrified person.

By:Jacob Gatt :)

No

Attila the Hun or Attila was a Hun ruler. He was born in 406 AD and ruled the Hun empire from 434 until his demise on 453 AD.

ATTILA --- meaning the father of the huns. attil atil attel atli atill attil - AA . etzel...... Ata -- father ila -- ?don't know. The name Toorila has the same root with the name Attila. Tooril was the leader of the Kerait MONGOLS and maybe a descendent of the huns. sory my bad English.

yes

The Romans

In the eyes of many, yes. In the eyes of most, no, just a very strong one.

Asiatic

*

false

Attila the Hun is often regarded as a military genius due to his strategic prowess and ability to unify disparate tribes under his leadership. He effectively utilized speed and mobility in his campaigns, employing hit-and-run tactics that overwhelmed his adversaries. His ability to intimidate and negotiate, often through fear, allowed him to secure advantageous positions and tributes from powerful enemies, including the Roman Empire. However, while he demonstrated exceptional tactical skills, the long-term effectiveness of his strategies was limited by the eventual decline of his empire after his death.

He didn't. He attacked Western Rome in 451 AD but was beaten in Gaul (France) by Western Forces under Flavius Aetius. A few years later he invaded Italy while Rome was still recovering but again was forced to retreat due to disease. He died soon after and was never able to conquer Rome. Hope this is helpful.

Yifu Hun died in 466.

Yes, Attila the Hun murdered his brother Prince Blader for power. Attila wanted to be king instead.

yes

Well, I know that Attila drowned in his own blood. I also know that the Huns ate ther meat raw right off of dead animals.

he wore leather armour

Although the Huns may be connected to peoples who lived in modern Mongolia, by the time of Attila they had been living in and around Europe for centuries. So no, he personally was not from Mongolia, but his people may have been. It is disputed by scholars.

Attila's weapon of choice was the Magyar Composite Bow, a devastating curved bow.Attila the Hun shot this from horseback with remarkable accuracy and power.This was his signature weapon, and his skill with it was legendary.

at his point about 400 thousand