Cosmology

You may want to check the Wikipedia article on the Big Bang, or science videos on YouTube, for more details; but briefly, the evidence is as follows:* According to calculations based on General Relativity, the Universe can't remain static for long - it must needs expand or contract eventually.

* Similarly, the Second Law of Thermodynamics doesn't allow a static Universe. Entropy increases; there are irreversible processes.

* The redshift of distant galaxies. The only reasonable explanation of this redshift is that the galaxies are moving away from us. This is related to,but not exactly the same, as the Doppler effect.

* The mix of elements and isotopes in the current stage of the Universe closely matches theoretical calculations based on the Big Bang.

* The cosmic microwave background radiation closely matches that which is expected from the Big Bang model. It is a remnant of the time when the Universe cooled below about 3000 K.

COBE or the Cosmic Background Explorer is a satellite which is dedicated to cosmology. It was aimed at investigating cosmic background microwave radiation and help to improve our general understanding of the universe.

All the time. That is the meaning of continuous. However this theory was refuted when the 3K background radiation was detected, confirming the big bang.

Of coarse you can because zanmato can kill any creature insantly if you pay the right amount

Only black holes and subatomic particles remain. The universe has expanded so much that these individual particles may be separated from each other by truly enormous distances. Black holes themselves are now evaporating by Hawking radiation.

A redshift occurs when the wavelengths increase in objects by light or electromagnetic radiation levels in an object. In cosmological redshift also has to do with light; however, instead of an increase in wavelengths, there is an expansion of the universe.

no

The evidence that we live in an expanding, and not a static,Universe is as solid as the evidence that we live in on a round, and not a flat,planet. Gravity is the only force we know of that could slow down "Hubble" Expansion but, for many decades, we were unable to calculate how rapidly this slow-down of Hubble Expansion was occurring. It was QUITE a shock when we found that, over time, the rate of expansion was INCREASING over time. Again, this fact is as irrefutable as the fact thatour Earth is going around our Sun.

Since we "define" dark energy as "whatever it is that is causing the rate of Hubble Expansion to increase over time," the fact that the rate is increasing is all the support that is needed.

We do not actually know what will or could happen.

The concept of heaven varies across different religions and belief systems. In many religious traditions, heaven is considered a realm outside of the physical universe, beyond earthly time and space. It is often described as a spiritual realm where souls dwell in harmony with a divine presence.

Something called "dark energy" which provides almost 70% of the total energy in the observable universe and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate (instead of decelerate as expected in the basic big bang model of the universe).

Dark matter in the halo of the Milky Way is mostly thought to be in the form of non-baryonic particles, such as Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) or Axions. These particles do not interact with electromagnetic forces and are thus difficult to detect directly. Other possibilities include primordial black holes or exotic compact objects.

There is no such thing as a "hypernova". Making up words does not make something real.

We do not know what dark energy is, so we can only theorize about its sources. However, if dark energy were much stronger than current observations estimate, life would not be possible. Therefore, we can say dark energy is weak in our Universe, because our Universe is capable of supporting life.

This phenomenon is called red shift.

The universe did not exist before the Big Bang. There was nothing there. It can be hard to grasp for young minds.

Some objects that are not permanent in the universe include comets, which have highly elliptical orbits and can leave the solar system, and supernovae, which are massive explosions that mark the end of a star's life. Additionally, transient phenomena like gamma-ray bursts and gravitational waves do not have a long-lasting presence in the universe.

Those are two completely unrelated concepts.

Quite simply, the universe consists of everything we know. There are no proven thories of so-called "extrauniversal" matter at this time so everything we know as fact, is contained within the universe and is apart of the universe itself. Theoretically, knowing of anything extrauniversal would require that the observer also exist outside of the universe, just like how it is impossible for humans to properly perceive anything that exists in 4 spacial dimensions and just like how humans only see in 2 dimensions (If humans perceived in 3 dimensions, you would see the back of everything as well as the front at the same time).

So as far as factual evidence goes, the universe consists of everything.

It's not certain that there is an answer to this question. The big bang was the beginning of the universe... not stars and planets and stuff. but of the universe itself. The very question of what was "before" may well be meaningless.

Better depth perception.

The best explanation is done by this video http://revver.com/video/99898/imagining-the-tenth-dimension/ Watch it all the way through, and your welcome!

I watched the video.

There is no 11th dimension, but the tenth dimension is all possible universes inside a geometrical point. There cannot be anything more than that.

Space is an infinite extension of any 3D region filled with matter. If that is the case, that would mean that the was no space before the big bang-where the universe begun hence space is the property of the universe meaning space must have been created with/by the big bang .If space were to be destroyed,(which I certainly hope you don't wish for that)I'm afraid even your great-great of your great descendents won't be able to see the results.....Remember you are also existing in space and time , the solar system you are in is isolated in a vastness of space.If the universe expands it can only do that in space-time meaning that space is continually expanding and applying the same theory in reverse it should give us the opposite so as to say contraction might destroy space. ---- Space traditionally exists in three dimensions: width, breadth, and depth. A dictionary definition of the word space is: the unlimited or incalculably great three-dimensional realm or expanse in which all material objects are located and all events occur. A moderntwist is the addition of a fourth dimension: time. Space is the "container" within which everything exists. From our remote position on Earth, we can see aroundfourteen billion light years in every direction, giving the universe an approximatesize of twenty-eight billion light years in diameter. Given that light can travel at 300,000 kilometers a second, and would taketwenty-eight billion years to cross the universe,it's hard to imagine how big that really is. My calculations come out at around 227,059,200,000,000,000,000,000 kilometers across. Is there a name for a number that large? According to Big Bang theory and subsequent observations, the universe is expanding, and accelerating outwards, just like an explosion. The main opposition to this expansion is the amount of gravity generated by all the matterwithin the container,slowing downthe growth of space. Using mathematics and observations, astronomers have calculated the amount of "visible" matter available, but it doesn't appear to account for all the gravity we think there should be.We are now searching for a theoretical type of matterdubbed "dark matter", which may generate the gravity we expect to see. If the amount of gravity in the universe is greater than a particular threshold, it could slow, stop and even reverse the expansion, causing all matter to close back in toward the original location of the Big Bang. This could cause a "Big Crunch" and perhaps another Big Bang, creating a whole new, fresh universe. This supposed cyclical nature of the universe is controversial and as the cycle takes place over tens of billions of years, we are unlikely to ever know for sure.

In this time, assuming protons do not decay, the estimated time until all baryonic matter has either fused together to form iron-56 or decayed from a higher mass element into iron-56.