Donald Trump

Point: Yes, they should destroy the wall.

Counterpoint: No. That would be destruction of someone else's property which is not legal or appropriate. People from any country are welcome to enter when done according to United States regulations.

What would actually happen: Mexicans will not destroy the wall, because it would be built on the American side, and this would be a useless exercise in vandalism: today there is a steel fence along the US-Mexico border, which is much easier to destroy, but that has not been due to this fact. However, it may never be built at all; If so, immigrants as well as drug cartels will find other ways to reach the United States. A couple of examples include smuggling of people and drugs through tunnels under the wall, or to using high-speed boats.

Point: We Mexicans have the right to travel to any country we want to travel to and other people need to suck it up.

Counterpoint: No one has the right to enter any country illegally. It is reported that Mexico deports more people who are in the country illegally than does the United States. It is also reported that Mexico's immigration laws are more strict than in the United States. Perhaps Mexico should be as lenient as the US.

What would actually happen: Mexican people have the right to travel to any country they want; However, they do not have the right to enter and remain in that country unless they follow the appropriate immigration process and become legal residents or citizens of that country. So yes, Mexicans have the right to try to enter illegally into the United States, but the United States government also has the right to deport or imprison them if they become repeat offenders.

Point: Vicente Fox has announced that Donald Trump's wall will be destroyed by us Mexicans pretty soon and Donald Trump will need to suck it up.

Counterpoint: Vicente Fox has not be the President of Mexico since 2006. Interesting that you feel that the current President doesn't run the country. Even so, invading another country for the purpose of undermining its security is tantamount to a declaration of war. President Trump is not going to stand still for that.

What would actually happen: Vicente Fox is a former Mexican president who is no longer involved in Mexican politics, and just as he loves to troll the president of the United States, he does not dictate Mexican policy towards the United States. Moreover, most people in Mexico are quite indifferent to the wall because nowadays, most of the immigrants who enter the United States are Central Americans, not Mexicans. However, forcing Mexico to pay for such wall is such a contentious issue for Mexicans, that it is considered an act of war -- say, to the degree that if any Mexican President accepted such terms, civil unrest and even a revolution could be triggered, and decades of relative cooperation and peace among both nations would fade away very quickly.

Actually, Donald Trump can be president.

Here's the thing, a lot of people do not like Donald Trump, myself among them. However, there are also a lot of people that do really like Donald Trump.

Not everyone is going to agree, and that is fine. You don't have to like Donald Trump. You don't have to like Hillary Clinton. You can even dislike them both. You aren't even required to vote, although it is strongly recommended. It's the United States, and you have the freedom to make those choices.

That's why we have elections. Not everyone is going to agree, but in the end, our voices are heard. The person we wanted may or may not make it in, but we were at least able to be a part of the decision making process.

Until then, we just have to wait until November elections. We learn all we can about both candidates, and where they stand on our beliefs. We make our educated decision as to who we think will be best (or less awful if that is how you feel), and we see who comes out winner in the end.