IQ

IQ is meant to be age adjusted so that the age of the boy should be irrelevant. With a good, standardised test, a population has an average IQ of 100 with standard deviation 15. So 119 is more than 1 sd above the average.

There are the typical testing characteristics of being properly standardized, using a proper sample to normalize it, and be consistent and verifiable. Beyond that, you have to realize there is no single "intelligence" - there are multiple cognitive abilities: logical reasoning, pattern recognition, spatial awareness, etc. So an IQ test may measure all of these, but to do so properly, it must remove influence of prior knowledge (beyond an understanding of the language and numbers being used). This means not asking about where a city is or needing to know about different animals, nor should it involve trick questions which bias much more heavily from having seen such questions before (ultimately there will always be some benefit from having seen similar question before, but this should be minimized). All the information you need should be in front of you, and you only need to be able to process the information to answer the question, because that's what cognitive skills are. Testing information you know is measuring "achievement". Pretty much every IQ test you find online will fail at this because they are not real IQ tests. They are just something made to generate traffic, and usually hand out lots of absurdly high scores.

It is called the mensa organisation

Simi's tests so far can be expressed as 320 percent divided by four. To average 84 percent, she would need five times 84 or 420 percent. The difference is 100%. Assuming all the tests are equally weighted, she needs 100% on the 5th test.

yes that is a great score iv gotten 11.0 and im 13 year old boy

The prominent French psychologist, Alfred Binet, first developed the IQ test in response to France becoming a country with education for all children in 1904. Before, the only school children were the offspring of the well-to-do. France was now faced with the challenge of educating the masses, and they needed a way to separate those who needed special help from those who were average, and from those who were advanced.

27

If the boy's chronological age and mental age are equal, his IQ would be assumed to be 100. (Using chronological age x IQ/100 as the template).

in my pocket

Interval scale

Source:

http://ksumail.kennesaw.edu/~rouyang/ED-research/results.htm

Parp.

First, IQ tests are designed so that your score takes your age into account. This means that (ideally) a person exactly as smart as you, but older or younger than you should get the exact same score. (So if a person exactly as smart as you, but 30 years old took an IQ test, they should also get 109).

Now for the main part of your question. A score of 109 is less than one standard deviation above the norm (average). This means you scored higher than approximately 70% of people. So, for every hundred people you meet, on average, you are smarter than 70 of them and 29 are smarter than you.

You should be careful though if you took the test off a website or some other place online it is most likely not accurate. The only way to get a real IQ test that is reliable and valid (meaning, it measures your intelligence accurately) is to get professionally tested through a mental health professional using a carefully researched and designed measure. For someone your age the most likely test they would use is the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R) which is used to test intelligence in children aged 6 to 16.

And remember, IQ is just a measure of one kind of intelligence, and your results can be affected by things such as ADHD or learning disabilities.

yes, average is 100.

Monozygotic twins who have been raised in the same environment are most likely to have the most similar IQ scores.

The average IQ for any age is 100

probably like 10 cuz it sucks. get a yamaha! polaris is just cheep junk

z = 3

First, IQ tests are designed so that your score takes your age into account. This means that (ideally) a person exactly as smart as you, but older or younger than you should get the exact same score. (So if a person exactly as smart as you, but 30 years old took an IQ test, they should also get 139).

Now for the main part of your question. A score of 139 is more than two standard deviations above the norm (average). This means you scored higher than approximately 98% of people. So, for every hundred people you meet, on average, you are smarter than 98 of them and one is smarter than you.

You should be careful though if you took the test off a website or some other place online it is most likely not accurate. The only way to get a real IQ test that is reliable and valid (meaning, it measures your intelligence accurately) is to get professionally tested through a mental health professional using a carefully researched and designed measure. For someone your age the most likely test they would use is the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R) which is used to test intelligence in children aged 6 to 16.

And remember, IQ is just a measure of one kind of intelligence, and your results can be affected by things such as ADHD or learning disabilities.

183

x/^2/14^2+y^2/7^2=1

A score of 128 is just under two standard deviations above the norm (average). This means you scored higher than approximately 83% of people. So, for every hundred people you meet, on average, you are smarter than 83 of them and 16 are smarter than you.

You should be careful though if you took the test off a website or some other place online it is most likely not accurate. The only way to get a real IQ test that is reliable and valid (meaning, it measures your intelligence accurately) is to get professionally tested through a mental health professional using a carefully researched and designed measure.

And remember, IQ is just a measure of one kind of intelligence, and your results can be affected by things such as ADHD or learning disabilities.

An IQ of 112 is above average for anybody.

IQ is not dependent on age it is a Quotient (that s where the Q comes from) and in the formula for calculationg IQ, the age is a factor so a 9 year old with an IQ if 112 probably knows a lot less (is dumber) than a 26 year old with an IQ of 83.

superior

A score of 138 is more than two standard deviations above the norm (average). This means you scored higher than approximately 98% of people. So, for every hundred people you meet, on average, you are smarter than 98 of them and one is smarter than you.

You should be careful though if you took the test off a website or some other place online it is most likely not accurate. The only way to get a real IQ test that is reliable and valid (meaning, it measures your intelligence accurately) is to get professionally tested through a mental health professional using a carefully researched and designed measure.

And remember, IQ is just a measure of one kind of intelligence, and your results can be affected by things such as ADHD or learning disabilities.