What measurements do scientist use to measure stars?
Hi. It is a pleasure to help. If you mean the distance from the earth to the stars, astronomers use a technique called parallax which is a way to infer the distance to a star based on triangulation. Astronomers use a unit called the light-year, which is the distance travelled by the light in one year. Since light travels at a speed of 300,000 km/s, in one year light leaves behind a distance of 9.4605284 × 1015 meters. Some stars are only a few light- years away. Others are very far away, in the limits of the observable universe. If the astronomer wants to measure the distance to a very far away star, then parallax is no longer useful. Other techniques and properties are employed such as the Cepheids, which are a very particular class of stars in which the period of variation in their brightness is related to their distances. So by measuring the period, astronomers are able to infer the distance.
Measuring distances to stars and to distant galaxies is one of the central problems in Astronomy. It is VERY important. Several research efforts are devoted to measuring distances. In fact, in the 1920's E. Hubble first measured the distance to other galaxies using cepheids. The Hubble Sapce Telescope still measures distances to distant galaxies using a variety of observational techniques.
If you mean the measurement of the radius of a star, astronomers do that by knowing the details of the cameras used to photograph the star and the known distance to it. Sometimes studying the properties of the light emitted by stars it is possible to infer its radius based on the theory of stellar evolution.
Prof. João Rodrigo Leão
Rio Grande Federal University - BRAZIL
What kind of information caused scientists to add the level domain to the system of classification?
you would need a teacher to help you. NOT ME
Was Kepler excommunicated from the Catholic church?
No, he was excommunicated from the Lutheran Church.
How do scientist use integers?
they must know the correct amount of chemicals to put in their experiement
Who was well known for saying eureka?
This exclamation is most famously attributed to the ancient Greek scholar Archimedes. He reportedly proclaimed "Eureka!" when he stepped into a bath and noticed that the water level rose-he suddenly understood that the volume of water displaced must be equal to the volume of the part of his body he had submerged. (This relation is not what is known as Archimedes' principle-that deals with the upthrust experienced by a body immersed in a fluid[2][3]) He then realized that the volume of irregular objects could be measured with precision, a previously intractable problem. He is said to have been so eager to share his discovery that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked.
Archimedes' insight led to the solution of a problem posed by Hiero of Syracuse, on how to assess the purity of an irregular golden votive crown; he had given his goldsmith the pure gold to be used, and correctly suspected he had been cheated, by the goldsmith removing gold and adding the same weight of silver. Equipment for weighing objects already existed, and now that Archimedes could also measure volume, their ratio would give the object's density, an important indicator of purity.
This story first appeared in written form in Vitruvius's books of architecture, two centuries after it supposedly took place.[4] Some scholars have doubted the accuracy of this tale, saying among other things that the method would have required precise measurements that would have been difficult to make at the time.[5] For the problem posed to Archimedes, though, there is a simple method which requires no precision equipment: balance the crown against pure gold in air, and then submerge the scale with crown and gold in water to see if they still balance.[6]
What is volume would be occupied by 7.75g of a substance with a density of 1.70766?
The answer depends on the units for density. Commonly used ones are gram per cubic centimetre and kilogram per cubic metre. There is a difference of a factor of 1000 between the two.
Depending on which it is,
Volume = Mass/Density, with appropriate adjustment for units.
How scientist can prove that central blue cone is the blue flame is unburnt gas?
They could test it and see how i works?
Why do scientists gain new knowledge?
Scientists have two motives for gaining new knowledge. First, science is motivated by curiosity. Scientists are very interested in understanding the world better. Second, scientific knowledge has proved to have many practical applications, and our experience has been that new knowledge is going to come in handy in various ways that are often difficult to predict.
true
By keeping documents and writing things that is important and needs to keep track with.
What might a scientist do after observing and recording information in an investigation?
Create Conclusions And Theories
Why is it important for a scientist to make careful observations and to keep accurate records?
So They Can Have The Accurate Answers
How do scientists discuss new ideas?
Scientists usually publish their new ideas in a scientific journal. They can also hold a symposium to discuss the ideas, if they wish.
When a controlled experiment is not possible or practical, two types of scientific investigations are observation and modeling.
an economist
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results.
2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
Why is rejection of hypothesis helpful to scientists?
That is progress, you start with a hypothesis, e.g. the moon is made of cheese, then it is tested by experiments to see if it's right. If the experiment says it's wrong, that is something that does not have to be tested again.
What is the name for a scientist who studies kids?
a childologist
i am not too sure about this answer but if youthink its wrong call this number [1876]2564457]
How are scientists able to make predictions?
You assume that things that happened repeatedly in a certain way in the past will happen the same way under the same conditions in the future. If you throw a ball up in the air 500 times and it comes down 500 times, you then predict that if you throw a piano into the air it will come down as well. If you throw a helium balloon up in the air for the first time, you might predict it will also come down. When it does not, this means the theory must be rejected or changed to explain what is different this time. If you have a hydrogen balloon and throw it into the air, you might predict that since your helium balloon did not come down and hydrogen is more similar to helium than it is to a piano, then the hydrogen balloon will keep going as well.