Scientists

Hey, I've just received a free Minecraft Giftcodan one too! >> minecraftcodes.me <<

The simple answer is people don't like change. And to have this new idea that goes against something that may have been believed for hundreds or thousands of years, will very likely be rejected at first.

Paleontologist

An Ecologist. Hope I helped :)

becaus eit makes it simpler to know oh this is a bird. If he can say it is a bird you know a lot more about it

If scientists are closed minded, they will reject legitimate theories and discoveries just because they are new, and they conflict with previous theories. And when legitimate theories are rejected due to an excess of skepticism, science fails to advance. If, however, scientists are overly credulous, and do not apply an appropriate degree of skepticism to new claims, they will wind up wasting their time investigating an endless series of pseudo-scientific, crackpot theories, and they will never have time to make actual scientific progress. It is necessary to be able to reject nonsense rapidly, in order to avoid wasting time on it, while not being too hasty in rejecting theories which, when investigated, will prove to have a legitimate basis. So, it's a balancing act. One must avoid going to extremes, either of open mindedness or of skepticism. This is true not only for scientists, but for everyone.

Scientists study fossils, ancient tools, and DNA to learn more about early humans. By comparing and analyzing these sources of evidence, scientists can piece together information about the behavior, lifestyle, and relationships of our ancestors.

A scientist who studies radio waves is typically an astrophysicist or radio astronomer. They use radio telescopes to observe and analyze radio emissions from celestial bodies in order to learn more about the universe.

Silviculturist =Silvics involves understanding how trees grow, reproduce, and respond to environmental changes.

yes they were a lab coat to do everthing

Scientists don't wear pants. Pants can only hold back science.

Smart,kind/friendly,careful. What they do: Reads,has fun with their job,studies fish and underwater animals.

Its a good idea

graph!!! i remember this from my science tcap weekly review and i got it right!!

The days are long past in which a scientist could carry forward knowledge of a field as a solo effort. Science is a collaborative project where thousands of individuals each contribute small pieces of a massive puzzle. An unpublished result is effectively cut off from this project and contributes nothing to the accumulation of knowledge. When one scientist publishes a finding, others are able to build upon it, incorporate its ideas, and adjust their on-going research accordingly. Scientists are constantly adjusting their own research plans in the light of the announcements by other scientists.

A second reason for communication is that it permits outside verification and correction. Other scientists will be able to see the results and will often attempt to reproduce them. If other scientists succeed in reproducing the results, the certainty we may have in the data is greatly increased, if they fail to reproduce the results or find opposing results, then we have avoided placing excess certainty on a possibly invalid result. No one person has all the answers and by subjecting one's findings to assessment by the entire scientific community, others may correct, develop, and enhance one's findings.

Lastly, there are the real world personal and economic reasons. Scientists may be involved in the pursuit of knowledge, but most are also in the pursuit of fame and job security. For a professional scientist (and virtually all scientists earn their livings through research) to not publish their findings is comparable to a real estate agent not selling houses. Their pay, their prestige, their careers are entirely dependent upon their ability to publish their results. One of the primary criteria used by peers and research institutions to judge a scientist's merits is by the quality of their publications. Thus, a scientist who does not communicate their findings is a scientist who has absolutely no respect from his or her peers and is also a scientist who's bosses and funding agencies are no doubt beginning to wonder what that scientist is doing with all the money they're giving him/her. A scientist without a track record of quality publications is a scientist who will not be able to secure funding and not be able attract high quality students and researchers to their lab.

The fact is that Tesla was indeed recognized as a genius. He was, without doubt, a trail blazer who created astonishing, sometimes world-transforming, devices that often were virtually without theoretical precedent.

This law evolved gradually over time, as more types of energy were found to be interchangeable. No single scientist can be credited with the discovery of this law. A special mention should be made of Emily Nöther - today, the Law of Conservation of Energy is derived from Nöther's Theorem. However, the Law was well-known, as an experimental fact, before Nöther's time.

History fact where it tells the lifestyle in that specific period.

Diet - cave paintings sometimes gives scientist clues on what kind of food do ancestors hunt and eat.

Tools - scientist can determine the tools especially hunting materials. This can be seen from what most cave paintings tell visually (generally, hunting scenes)

When they discover new intelligence on the matter.

Scientists use a standardized system of measurement, like the metric system, to ensure consistency and accuracy in their experiments and data analysis. Using a common set of units helps to facilitate communication and collaboration among scientists worldwide.

In an expert system the sensor is capturing raw data. This data is used to analyze, examine, organize, and secure data for reporting and visualization.

Yes, scientists can use models to predict stability in a system by simulating how changes in output or feedback will influence the overall dynamics of the system. By testing different scenarios in the model, scientists can assess how the system will respond to various changes and identify conditions that may lead to instability. This predictive capability can help inform decision-making and improve our understanding of complex systems.

Curiosity is fundamental to science. Scientists investigate the world in which we live because they are curious about it. If they just wanted to make money, they would have become investment bankers instead.

An environmental veterinarian would study this particular example. Veterinarians study animals, and environmental vets study the effects a particular environment has on them.