the southern delegates would not have signed.
The three fifths compromise
cat dog hog mog and lion
cat dog hog mog and lion
The delegates were right to compromise over slavery because, despite the anti-slavery sentiments of many of the delegates, the southern representatives were not about to compromise the cornerstone of their economy. Demanding the immediate end of slavery would have caused them to walk out, jeopardizing the new nation. Therefore, the delegates kept slavery but left provisions for the elimination of slavery at a later date. Also, they added the three-fifths clause, which essentially hamstrung the southern states' ability to use slaves to inflate their population and therefore their representation in the House of Representatives.
they created the 3/5 compromise
The Three-Fifths Compromise was necessary as it aimed to balance the interests of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery delegates during the Constitutional Convention. Pro-slavery delegates wanted enslaved individuals counted for representation in Congress to gain more political power, while anti-slavery delegates opposed this, arguing that enslaved people should not be counted as citizens. The compromise allowed for enslaved individuals to be counted as three-fifths of a person, which helped to maintain a delicate balance between northern and southern states and facilitated the ratification of the Constitution. This agreement, however, reflected the deep divisions and moral compromises surrounding the issue of slavery in the early United States.
yes it is true
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, delegates reached a significant compromise regarding slavery known as the Three-Fifths Compromise. This agreement determined that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. Additionally, the convention addressed the importation of enslaved people, allowing it to continue for twenty more years until 1808, after which Congress could prohibit it. This compromise highlighted the contentious nature of slavery in the formation of the United States.
One significant compromise that was not made about slavery at the Constitutional Convention was the outright prohibition of slavery. While the Constitution included compromises like the Three-Fifths Compromise and the decision to allow the slave trade to continue for a certain period, there was no agreement to abolish slavery altogether. Instead, the delegates chose to accommodate the institution, reflecting the deep divisions and contentious nature of the issue at the time.
The major compromises that the delegates agreed to make were The Connecticut Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise, and The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise.
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention compromised on the slavery issue primarily to ensure the unity of the newly forming nation. Many Southern states relied on slavery for their agricultural economies, while Northern states were increasingly opposed to it. To achieve consensus and secure the ratification of the Constitution, they reached agreements like the Three-Fifths Compromise, which allowed slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes, balancing the interests of both regions. This compromise, however, highlighted the deep divisions over slavery that would continue to plague the nation.