The Allied Army was pleading with the Soviet Union to help them in the war against Japan, but Stalin wasn't convinced. Finally, at the Tehran conference in 1943, the Soviet Union decided they would not enter the war against Japan until the Allied Army defeated Nazi Germany.
The soviets goal was to spread communism in all of Europe so the soviets needed to get rid of non-communist powers to make this happen.
The difference is: in civil trials it is a "preponderance of evidence," whereas in a criminal trial it is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
the lightning thief
Yes, it is possible to confess to a crime without any evidence against you. However, it is important to note that a confession alone is not sufficient to prove guilt in a court of law. Other evidence, such as physical evidence or witness testimony, is typically needed to secure a conviction.
german invasion of 1941
It had to have been frightening. It could be directed against anyone and everyone, it rarely needed anything except an accusation and there were no rules of evidence and no appeals.
It had to have been frightening. It could be directed against anyone and everyone, it rarely needed anything except an accusation and there were no rules of evidence and no appeals.
Because Gorbachev needed someone to improve the Soviets relationship to the United States.
Clarification needed: evidence for what? What proposition are you trying to support?
The lawyer needed more evidence from the shooting to help his client.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Any evidence is archived and stored in case it is needed in the future.