Western expansion in the United States led to an imbalance in Congress as new territories and states were added, often as slave or free states, which affected the delicate balance of power between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 were attempts to address this imbalance by regulating the admission of states, but they ultimately highlighted the growing sectional tensions. As more western states were admitted, the struggle for representation intensified, contributing to the polarization that would culminate in the Civil War.
Because it was getting more difficult to create new slave-states, and the South was in danger of being outvoted in Congress.
Some Northerners objected to dividing the Nebraska Territory into two separate territories because they feared it would promote the expansion of slavery into new western territories. The proposed Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed for popular sovereignty, meaning that settlers in each territory could decide whether to allow slavery. Many Northerners believed this would undermine the Missouri Compromise, which had previously restricted slavery's expansion north of the 36°30' parallel, and they were concerned about the potential political imbalance it could create in Congress.
In the North. added Belgium and Luxembourg to Holland to create the kingdom of the Netherlands. To prevent French expansion eastward
Because it was getting harder to create new slave-states, so the South was increasingly outvoted in Congress.
The imbalance of one goup over another (more of one then the other).
In March of 1865 the US Congress became alarmed at the violence between settlers and Native American Tribes in the western frontiers. The Congress established the Joint Committee on the Condition of the Indian Tribes. This committee came to the conclusion, that at that time, white settlers were the main cause of violence between them and Native tribes.
Why did Congress create the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?
What factors in the auditor and client relationship create a power imbalance in favor of the client? In:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/FAQ/3335-35 [Edit categories]
Because it was becoming increasingly difficult to get Congress to agree to create new slave-states. This meant that the South was increasingly out-voted in Congress, which would then pass laws that favoured the North against the South.
gjaworegijtuighnisrtgn rojgroihjtog peoigjtohjt oiwhgirhngpa otiughtonhb
No. John Adams was not important in creating expansion in the US.
Because the South was finding it harder to create enough new slave-states to maintain voting strength in Congress. This meant that Congress would tend to pass laws favourable to the North, at the expense of the South.