answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?

Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?


If the supreme court does not rule on an appeal case what is the result?

The decision then remains what it was when appealed to the Supreme Court.


What is the Rule of Four in the US Supreme Court?

The Rule of Four means four of the nine justices must agree to hear a case in order for it to be accepted on appeal. If four or more justices think the case is worth the Court's time, then the Supreme Court will issue a writ of certiorari to the lower court ordering them to send the case files to the Supreme Court, and the case will be placed on the docket.


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


What is the rule of four in the supreme court?

The Rule of Four has nothing to do with arguing before the US Supreme Court. It refers to the number of US Supreme Court justices who must agree to hear a case before the case can be accepted on appeal. If four justices sign off on a petition for writ of certiorari (request for review), the case will be added to the Court's docket. For more information, see Related Questions, below.


How many US Supreme Court justices must agree to hear an appeal?

The US Supreme Court determines whether to hear a case according to the Rule of Four. If at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agree, they will grant certiorari and hear the case.


What did the supreme court rule in the case regarding the sedition act?

It ruled the act constitutional.


Which Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?

chimel v. califorina


What did the Supreme court rule in a case regarding Sedition Act?

It ruled the act constitutional.


Did supreme court rule in a case regarding the sedition act?

It ruled the act constitutional.


What did the Supreme Court rule the case near v Minnesota?

That a state could not punish


How did the supreme court rule over the ring v Arizona case?

Ruth Baber