The main argument in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) centered around the constitutionality of racial segregation laws. Homer Plessy, who was of mixed race, challenged Louisiana's Separate Car Act, arguing that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the segregation law, establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine, which justified racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were considered equal, thereby reinforcing systemic racism and discrimination in the United States.
The Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to equal treatment on a train
The Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to equal treatment on a train.
The main people involved in Plessy v. Ferguson were Homer Plessy, who was the plaintiff in the case and a man of mixed racial heritage, and Judge John H. Ferguson, who was the defendant in his capacity as a judge responsible for enforcing segregation laws in Louisiana. The lawyers who represented the parties before the Supreme Court were Albion Tourgée for Plessy and Milton J. Cunningham for Ferguson.
The main argument in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) centered on the legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth Black, challenged Louisiana's segregation laws after being arrested for sitting in a whites-only train car. The Supreme Court upheld the state's law, asserting that racial segregation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. This decision institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in the United States for decades.
(Apex) To establish the main points of the argument.
In Plessy v. Ferguson, Homer Plessy argued that Louisiana's segregation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the law was inherently discriminatory and stigmatized African Americans. Plessy maintained that racial segregation enforced by the state was a violation of his civil rights, as it marked him as inferior based solely on race. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the segregation laws, solidifying the legality of racial discrimination for decades.
Knowing how to read.
Refuting a counterclaim (APEX)
Answer this question… To restate the central point of the argument and make a final bid for the audience's support
The conclusion of an argument serves to summarize the main points presented in the argument, reiterate the main claim or thesis, and provide a sense of closure to the discussion. It offers the final opportunity to persuade the audience by restating the key reasons and reinforcing the validity of the argument.
That even though windo wolf comes from a different cult the teacher should still treat him fairly and with respect (apex)
The main reason behind the decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case was the upheld legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Supreme Court ruled that as long as facilities and opportunities provided to African Americans were theoretically equal to those provided to whites, segregation was constitutional. This decision had significant implications for promoting racial discrimination and the perpetuation of Jim Crow laws in the United States.