answersLogoWhite

0

In Nixon v. Herndon (1927), the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas law prohibiting African Americans from voting in primary elections was unconstitutional, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The case highlighted the discriminatory practices in the electoral system and challenged the legality of racially exclusive voting laws. Ultimately, the Court's decision reinforced the principle that states cannot impose laws that disenfranchise citizens based on race. This case was a significant step in the broader Civil Rights Movement.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was true about the case of Nixon v. Herndon?

all of the above-apex


Who won in the us v Nixon case?

idk wut happened but i hope that someone answers me because this is for a project


What was the result of the Supreme Court case US v Nixon?

presidential powers were limited


Who were the parties in the US v. Nixon case?

United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)Petitioner: United States, brought by Special Prosecutor Leon JaworskiRespondent: President Richard NixonAttorneysJames D. St. Clair (argued case for the President)Leon Jaworski (argued case for the United States)Philip A. Lacovara (argued case for the United States, consolidated case Nixon v. US)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What case limited executive privilege?

United States v. Nixon was the case that questioned executive privilege. The case was decided on July 24, 1974. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously against Nixon.


What was the NAACP trying to achieve in the Nixon v herndon case?

primary elections.


Which landmark Supreme Court case involved the idea of executive privilege?

United States v. Nixon


What did the supreme court case US v Nixon confirmed?

The rule of law over executive privilege.


What is an example of privilege?

One example of executive privilege is the case of U.S. v. Nixon. This case focused on the criminal case of President Nixon and his invoking of privilege in order to refuse to produce copies of phone calls that took place in the Oval Office.


Who were the main parties involved in the US v Nixon case?

The main parties involved in the US v. Nixon case were President Richard Nixon and the United States government, represented by the special prosecutor and other officials. The case arose from the Watergate scandal, leading to Nixon's refusal to release audio tapes related to the investigation. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the President was not above the law, requiring him to turn over the tapes. This decision was pivotal in upholding the principle of accountability in the executive branch.


What was in the original case of us v Nixon before it was appealed?

The original case of United States v. Nixon involved a dispute over whether President Richard Nixon had to comply with a subpoena to produce tape recordings and documents related to the Watergate scandal. Nixon claimed executive privilege, arguing that the tapes were protected from disclosure. The district court ruled against him, leading to the appeal. The case ultimately centered on the balance of power among the branches of government and the limits of executive privilege.


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the US v. Nixon case of 1974?

Nixon v. United States is not related to the case involving former President Richard Nixon.The Nixon v. US, (1993) ruling listed in United States Reports (the official volumes containing US Supreme Court opinions) is Nixon v. United States, 506 US 224 (1993). This case is not related to former President Nixon, but to an impeached Mississippi US District Court judge, Walter Nixon, who appealed the Senate's impeachment ruling to the US Supreme Court.In that case, the Court determined that impeachment proceedings are non-justiciable, and are political matters, or the province of Congress. The 1993 Nixon case set a formal precedent preventing impeached officials from appealing their impeachment in court.William Rehnquist wrote the opinion of a unanimous Court. Justices Stevens, White and Souter wrote concurring opinions.