0
Take away rights of individuals and states.
What else can I help you with?
What was the difference between the federalists and anti federalists?
Federalists were for the proposed constitution, while the anti-federalists were opposed because they thought it gave the national government too much power and took too much from the states.
Anti-Federalists criticized the Constitution on the grounds that it gave it too much power to who?
Anti-Federalists didn't like the Constitution because they thought it gave too much power to the National/Federal Government. (It was too much like England's government.) Specifically, they thought that the power given to the executive branch, especially the president, was too much. They feared that the government could turn into a Monarchy.
Could you answer this Several states would not ratify the Constitution because there was no what?
Several states feared the strong federal government and wanted the BILL OF RIGHTS added.
The federalists were against the constitution?
The Anti-Federalists feared the Constitution because they thought it gave too much power to the federal government; moreover, it didn't have a Bill of Rights.
Why might the antifederalists think the constitution would reduce the power of the states?
Because they feared that a too-strong central government, would wipe out state powers and individual freedom.
Those who opposed the constitution feared what?
That the national government would takes rights away from people.
Why did the anti federalists object to the proposed constitution?
The anti-federalists opposed the constitution because they felt it made the government too Why_did_the_anti_federalists_object_to_the_proposed_constitution. Anti-federalists feared that the government would become tyrannical. Their opposition to the constitution ultimately lead to the creation of the Bill of Rights. This is the reason why the anti-federalists opposed the constitution.
Opponents of the Constitution demanded inclusion of the bill of rights because it feared abuse of power by?
The national government.
Anti-federalists opposed ratification because?
Patrick Henry opposed the Constitution. He feared that the central government woulds gain too much power. He felt that the Constitution went too far. He also opposed the Constitution because it did not have a bill of rights.
Why did many oppose the national bank?
Citizens feared that a central bank placed too much power in the hands of the federal government.
Who feared government more than disorder?
constitution
Which group feared the Constitution would make the central government too powerful and weaken the states?
group that feared a powerfull national gevernement
Not an Anti-Federalist criticism of the Constitution?
The Anti-Federalistsâ?? major criticism of the Constitution was that there was no Bill of Rights that protected the individual from a strong central government included at the time. The Anti-Federalists preferred strong state governments and a weak national government like how the Articles of Confederation had worked as opposed to the Federalistsâ?? preference for a strong central government, which they feared was too much like a monarchy.
Group that feared a powerful national government?
Antifeds!...
Why were the 13states feared any kind of national what?
The 13 states feared a national government that would control the states. The states wanted the government to have limited power, and to have checks and balances.
What is the name of the group that feared a powerful national government?
the antifederalist
That the people who feared a strong central government supported Hamilton's idea of a national bank why or why not?
Those who feared a strong central government, often aligned with Thomas Jefferson, opposed Hamilton's idea of a national bank because they believed it would concentrate power and financial control in the hands of a few, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They viewed the bank as a mechanism that could lead to federal overreach and potential tyranny. Additionally, they argued that the Constitution did not explicitly grant the federal government the authority to create a national bank, raising concerns about its legitimacy and the implications for state sovereignty.
