One that was a long time in sinking in is this: if your enemy is entrenched, and equipped with rifles, it is extremely costly to send your own men running at his positions in a frontal attack. This is a very bloody approach to the problem, and, seven times out of eight in the Civil War, it did not work. All the officers of both sides had studied at West Point and learned all about Napoleon. But in Napoleon's time the soldiers had inaccurate, smooth-bore muskets. In the US Civil War they had much more accurate, rifled weapons, with a much greater range. Trying Napoleonic tactics against this improved weaponry resulted in mass carnage. Commanders on both sides were slow to learn.
What's more inexcusable, though, is the fact that the European generals learned nothing from this lesson. They considered that there was nothing instructive for them in the American Civil War, which they believed amounted to two armed mobs chasing each other around in the woods. Nothing there applicable to Europe.
So, fifty years after the American Civil War ended, having largely been at peace for a century, European generals of every nation eagerly, bravely hurled their soldiers at the entrenched foe, who now had not a single-shot muzzle-loading rifle capable of three shots per minute in the hands of a trained man, but machine guns capable of firing six hundred shots per minute. Of course the slaughter was incalculable. But, unlike the generals of the Union and Confederate armies, the Europeans two generations later NEVER learned any better.
civil war can go in a sentence in many ways - I have some money from the civil war - my friend's great great grandfather fought in the civil war - the civil war was fought over rights for African Americans
There were no french in the civil war their are some in the revolution though.
500'000 men and some weren't in the war
the leaders from the civil war iz yo mahma bixh! hahahms. buckkley iz gay
some historical causes of the civil war were slavery and the splitting of the country people wanted to keep it together whcih caused it to split
Some consider the french revolution a civil war
some of the civil war millionares were, no particular order of their worth: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There is no civil war on today.
baths
If by Civil War you mean the War between the States in the US, then no. If you mean some other civil war, then maybe, you'll need to be more specific.
in the civil war some women where army nurses while some where spices and some take care of the home and are even in the war front.
civil war can go in a sentence in many ways - I have some money from the civil war - my friend's great great grandfather fought in the civil war - the civil war was fought over rights for African Americans
American Civil War & Vietnam War.
The main politic in the Civil War was slaverly . Some minor polictics in the Civil War were state rights, and econimic differences .
Women did not fight in the Civil War. But, some did dress up like men to help out in the war.
There were no french in the civil war their are some in the revolution though.
* * * * *