answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

American colonists should help pay for some of the expenses.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

the American colonists should help pay for some of the expenses

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Grenville assume would happen because the British government lacked money and managing the colonies was expensive?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

What was a lasting environmental legacy from progressive era?

To expand the federal government's role in managing natural resources.


The federal government financed the union war effort by?

The federal government the Civil War in a variety of ways. The first was by the Morrill Tariff, which easily passed in Congress due to the main critics of tariffs, the southerners, no longer coming to Congress. Greenbacks were published and immediately released in 1862, to help finance the war. The government also issued bonds as a revenue generator.


How did English manage to survive?

The English language has not really had any trouble managing to survive. Because of the British Empire, the English language was spread across the world.


What is the name of a person that builds houses called?

A person who builds houses is typically called a "builder" or a "contractor." Builders or contractors oversee the construction process, including coordinating subcontractors, managing materials, and ensuring that the project is completed according to the design and specifications.


What kind of union do the states have?

The United States have a 'Federal' system of government, which means that, in theory, powers are divided between state and local, and Federal (central) authorities. The US Government has evolved a great deal, structurally, since 1789-90, when the US Constitution setting up this arrangement first came into effect, but the momentum has generally been to centralize power more and more in the federal government, for several reasons. First, and most cynically, power, once acquired, is often maintained by precedent, and it can be difficult for another body to challenge that power. But more specific to US History, the USC was a reaction to the 'Articles of Confederation,' which theoretically unified the USA during the 1780s after their independence, but proved to have too weak a central government, and no way of resolving disputes among states effectively. Thus, the USC was a compromise document set up to remedy this problem without creating opportunities for authoritarianism or a dictatorship. It gave specific and critical powers to the US Government, while still referring to the provinces (the typical word in english for regions of a country) as 'states.' The word 'State' suggests that a state has independence and political power. The reality is more mixed. As US history progressed, managing a large and ever more complex (technologically and economically) society became more difficult, and more centralized government was needed. Thus, with several periods of rebellion against centralized power (the American Civil War was not one of them. Though many people believe this was a fight over states rights, the issue was not even raised until 1865 by Jefferson Davis after the war was lost. In any case, that argument is neatly dealt with by the following dialogue: 'the war was over states' rights? A state's right to DO WHAT?! It's also notable that the southern states pushed through the 'fugitive slave act,' which violated the laws of most northern states and demanded federal laws enforce slavery laws from the south beyond their territory). That digression over, a pro-business Supreme Court would not allow the Federal government to intervene in the economy between 1890 and 1932, roughly. They also invalidated the income tax as unconstitutional (a constitutional amendment reimposed it around 1913). However, from 1937, as Congress and the President struggled to deal with an economic emergency and the US Court began striking down important legislation (on very thin constitutional grounds, it mus be said) that the President believed imperiled the economy, the president strong-armed the court into allowing New Deal legislation through, paving the way for the New Deal to continue to provide millions of jobs for the unemployed, and, during the World War, take almost complete control over the economy. Since then, this organization was considered a settled question by legal experts, until, in the 2nd Bush administration, a 5 votes to 4 right-leaning supreme court started again to chip away at the Federal Government's authority. We have yet to see how this will play out. Most modern nations do not have 'Federal' central governments that can prevent them from taking what maybe necessary action, but many Americans believe limiting central government power is incredibly important, to limit tyrranyy