American importers were not paying the excessively high duty that had been placed on Sugar (molasses) by the Molasses Act of 1733. They found it cheaper to pay bribes of a penny or so per gallon, to the customs collectors. When George Grenville became Prime Minister, he had Parliament overhaul the old act with a new Sugar Act, 1764. The new act lowered the tax on sugar entering the colonies, but it also created a new system for enforcing the act, making sure that the lowered duties would be collected. In New England, where molasses was a major trade item used in making various drinks as well as a sweetener, there was immediate concern. A Boston town meeting declared that the city would boycott (not purchase) all British imports to that colony. Other New England cities, including New York, followed Boston’s lead. American Colonists granted Parliament the right to regulate trade but the colonists declared that the Sugar Act was an attempt to raise money in the colonies, something that colonists believed only colonial legislatures could do. They pointed to the official title of the Sugar Act--The American Revenue Act of 1764. Hence, the Americans, for perhaps the first time, raised the cry that they could not be taxed by a political body that did not represent them. They elected representatives to their assemblies, but not to Parliament. The cry, “No taxation without representation” would become a rallying cry for those favoring independence. In 1766, the British government reduced the duty on sugar to one penny (what had been the “traditional” bribe), and protest in New England began to subside. The colonists, for the first time, really began to protest Parliament’s regulations. In Boston, they held a town meeting and declared they would not import any British goods of any kind until the Sugar tax was repealed. Other cities, like New York, followed suit. The colonists reaction was considered mild and no violence developed. In fact, the tax only effected the wealthy. In 1766 when the tax was lowered, there was nothing more heard about protesting the Act.
what was the cause and effect of the proclamation act
Some one please answer this dang question cause i need to know it.
The cause was that it encouraged Manifest destiny and many families traveled to the west. The effect was that it sparked disagreement from the southern states and they were worried that the Homestead Acts would cause the northern states to oppose slavery.
It did work and the colonists all loved it. The sugar act may have been the best idea parliment had sense the Stamp act.
george washintonErm, actually George Washington had his own plantation, it was William wilberfrce and thomas Clarkson
The Sugar Act went in to effect in 1764.
what was the cause and effect of the proclamation act
Sugar can cause you to be hyper.
what was the cause and effect of the proclamation act
It made them pay more
Some one please answer this dang question cause i need to know it.
The Molasses Act of 1733 The trouble was how it would effect the making of Rum.
The Sugar Act
sugar act
well, the sugar act of 1764 was again passed by King George and the british parliamnent. The earlier Molasses Act of 1733 which imposed a tax of six pence per gallon of molasses.
Crushing sugar into smaller particulates INCREASES the rate at which the sugar will dissolve because the water can act on a larger overall surface area.
It just made the colonist even angrier and they wanted freedom even more