answersLogoWhite

0

Weeks v. US, (1914) was the case that established the "exclusionary rule," preventing evidence gathered through illegal or unreasonable search and seizure of a suspect from being used to prosecute the suspect in court. This Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure protection originally applied only to federal casesbecause the Supreme Court hadn't incorporated much of the Bill of Rights to the States in 1914.

Case Citation:

Weeks v. US, 232 US 383 (1914)

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which 1960s U.S. Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level?

The 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that made the exclusionary rule applicable to state criminal prosecutions is Mapp v. Ohio. In this landmark decision, the Court held that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, cannot be used in state courts. This ruling extended the exclusionary rule, previously applicable only to federal cases, to the states, reinforcing the protection of individual rights against unlawful government actions.


What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?

Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?


What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?

Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?


The US Supreme Court has declined to extend the exclusionary rule to searches conducted by whom?

The Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted by school administrators.


What did the supreme court rule in mapp v. Ohio?

In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, cannot be used in state courts. This decision extended the exclusionary rule, previously applicable only to federal courts, to the states. The ruling emphasized the importance of protecting individual rights and maintaining judicial integrity by deterring illegal police conduct.


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


The supreme court has adopted the exclusionary rule to protect citizens from?

illegal searches


Which Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?

chimel v. califorina


In deciding cases involving laws that punish sedition the Supreme Court has developed the?

exclusionary rule


Which us supreme court cases was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?

chimel v. califorina


Which 1961 decision extended exclusionary rules of search and seizure to state court proceedings?

The 1961 decision that extended exclusionary rules of search and seizure to state court proceedings is Mapp v. Ohio. In this landmark ruling, the Supreme Court held that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state courts, thereby incorporating the exclusionary rule to apply to both federal and state prosecutions. This decision emphasized the importance of protecting individuals' constitutional rights against unlawful searches and seizures.


In what year did the US Supreme Court extend the exclusionary rule to the States?

1961The US Supreme Court extended the exclusionary rule to the state as a result of their decision in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961). The rule was originally created and applied to the federal government in Weeks v. US, (1914).