Freedom of speech. The First Amendment
The United States Congress was firmly in support of war against Japan since the US was attacked first. Elements in the US Congress were more reluctant to go to war against Germany but Hitler's decision to declare war on the USA resolved that. In general, the US Congress supported the action of their president and followed a bilateral foreign policy.
To be recognised by Congress and the rest of the world as a sovereign nation.
All peopel will get the same protection therefore they will not getscared to fight. MOre and more people will go to fight. Other realson is that because everyone is getting the same protection, the conflicts between diffrent peopel will not occur.
No, not in the United States. It had been outlawed since 1867 with the 13 amendment . Slavery still does exist in the world and in many countries.
World War I played a significant role in the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, which granted women the right to vote in the United States. As women took on essential roles in the workforce and served in various capacities during the war, their contributions highlighted their capabilities and strengthened arguments for gender equality. The war also shifted public perceptions about women's roles in society, leading to increased support for women's suffrage. Consequently, in 1920, the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified, reflecting the changing attitudes towards women's rights influenced by their wartime efforts.
i will assume that you are talking about the first 10 amendment's therefore its the 2nd, the right to bear arms
Hitler violated the UDHR in many ways. In Article 1 the UDHR states that everyone has the right to life. During World War Two About 6 million is generally given the number of Jews killed during the Holocaust under Hitler. This is how Hitler completely violated article one of the UDHR
The Japanese internment during World War II did not violate the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. While the internment involved the forced relocation and incarceration of Japanese Americans, it primarily infringed upon rights protected by the First Amendment (freedom of speech and religion) and the Fifth Amendment (due process). The Second Amendment's focus on the right to bear arms was not directly implicated in the actions taken against Japanese Americans during this period.
Germany violated the United States freedom of the seas during World War I with its unrestricted submarine warfare.
It was the congress of Vienna It was the congress of Vienna
Many people argue that the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II violated the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees due process and prohibits the government from depriving individuals of liberty without lawful reason. Additionally, the internment is often viewed as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, as it specifically targeted individuals based on their race and ethnicity, rather than any legitimate security threat. This action has been widely condemned as a grave injustice and a violation of civil rights.
they had right, but they were just violated and not respected, i am not sure about the responsibilities
Yes. They have compensated most victims
NO
During World War II, the internment of Japanese Americans violated their constitutional rights, particularly the Fifth Amendment's protection against deprivation of liberty without due process. The U.S. government forcibly relocated and confined approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans, two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens, in camps based on their ethnicity rather than any evidence of disloyalty. This action reflected racial prejudice and resulted in significant loss of property and personal freedom, undermining fundamental democratic principles.
due process
Charles T. Schenck was the secretary of the Socialist Party of America in Philadelphiaduring the First World Warand involved in the 1919 Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States.Schenck had been indicted and tried for distributing 15,000 subversive leaflets to prospective military draftees during World War I. The leaflets urged the potential draftees to refuse to serve, if drafted, on the grounds that military conscription constituted involuntary servitude, which is prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment. The Federal government held the position that Schenck's actions violated the Espionage Act of 1917.Schenck was convicted, but he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the court decision violated his First Amendment rights. However, the Court unanimously upheld his conviction.