Tactical decisions support the strategic decision of the organisation. They tend to be of medium significance with moderate consequences.
Tactical decisions, which focus on more intermediate-term issues, are typically made by middle managers.
examples of tactical decision-making
It should be noted that in many "flatter" organizations, where the middle management level has been eliminated, both tactical and operational decisions are made by lower-level management and/or teams of employees.
Making decisions that help make business more efficient are part of production and operations management. Other characteristics include conscientious and tactical decisions.
Robert M. Deffenbaugh has written: 'Investigation of the statistical decisions process for anti-submarine warfare tactical decisions'
Tactical decisions involve creating short-term strategies designed to bring a positive result or an immediate solution to a particular problem. They are seen in politics as well as in business.
The purpose of decisions made at this level is to help move the company closer to reaching the strategic goal.
Your question is incomplete, however relatively many of the Japanese decisions during World War 2 were not wise strategic decisions and several were unwise tactically.
Example sentence is: I use my tactical skills when I play tennis.
spreadsheet model of income projection
Teaching tactical principles provides a foundational understanding that can be applied across various situations, helping players make informed decisions. On the other hand, teaching tactical options focuses on specific scenarios and may not transfer as effectively to new situations. It's generally more effective to develop a strong understanding of principles, which can then be used to inform and adapt tactical options as needed.