That is a really tricky one...I hate to say it, but I think the living children have first burial rights IF they are adult age (18+)...because the way i think of it, when your daughter became an adult, you ceased being her guardian...you may wanna ask a lawyer though
Yes, unless the will of the deceased daughter specifies otherwise or the will of the parent includes a different mechanism or cuts of those who are pre-deceased.
Three children, 2 living one deceased. he has four children, three living, one deceased
If the deceased has no children, yes. Otherwise the children share in his estate. This may vary by State.
Sylvester Stallone has a total of four living children and one deceased child. His living children are Seargeoh Stallone, Sophia Rose Stallone, Sistine Rose Stallone, and Scarlet Rose Stallone. His deceased son is Sage Stallone.
Defoe argues that the state of being dead makes burial rituals irrelevant to the deceased, as they are no longer conscious or aware. He suggests that the rituals are for the living to process grief and show respect, rather than impacting the deceased in any way.
she had one living daughter who became Queen Elizabeth I. There were no other living children.
Yes. He had three girls Two living in California, and one deceased.
Mate: Tigerstar - Deceased, Verified Place of No Stars member Daughter: Mothwing - Living, as of Fading Echoes Sons: Tadpole - Deceased, Residence Unknown Hawkfrost - Deceased, Verified Place of No Stars member
some people think its no but he does have a daughter and he is still alive living with his daughter in Baltimore
The living sister would be qualified as long as she is not under 19 years old.
The antonym for deceased is living or alive.
Using "was" when referring to someone who lived before but is now deceased is more appropriate because it reflects the past tense of their life. Using "is" would imply that the person is still alive, which can create confusion or give incorrect information.