Anyone who has heard of the Anthropic Principle, for a start.
The universe appears to be tailor made for human life. The question is whether it *was* tailored, or if we exist because that's how the universe happens to be.
For example: if the rules were different, would a being be asking (right now) how come the temperature of 1000 degrees on the planet seems *so perfect* for life: surely, they would argue, this is not a co-incidence. It *must* have been made just so that life could arise.
The word "billions" is also significant. With billions of planets out there, the odds *against* one having the precise criteria for life (as we know it) are pretty low. What about universes? This is the only one we *know* exists. But how many others are there, with different physical rules?
The universe we live in appears to be tailor-made for us. But we wouldn't exist if it didn't. The question is: how likely is it for this universe to exist?
We don't know how universes come into existence, so it's not a question we can answer at this time.
But it's worth bearing in mind that "we don't know" is not the same thing as "goddidit". Anyone who takes the latter stance should provide evidence to support their view. Despite a couple of thousand years of research, nobody has yet provided a single convincing argument for god(s).
Yes. For example, theoretical physicist and popular science writer Paul Davies (whose early writings were not especially sympathetic to theism) states concerning the fundamental structure of the universe, "the impression of design is overwhelming" (Davies, 1988, p. 203). See also:
No. Einstein believed in a infinite universe.
he didn't
Einstein wanted to know about how the universe works.
Einstein never made any such calculation. Even today the total size of our Universe is speculative at best. Einstein speculated it was infinite in both size and age.
Albert Einstein
There are hundreds of things named after Albert Einstein. Among them are Boseâ??Einstein statistics, Einstein's constant, Einstein's radius of the universe,Einstein coefficients, and Einstein cosmological constant to get the list started.
No, in the sense that there are still things to be understood. Einstein was successful in some ways, like the Universe is four dimensional, Special Relativity Theory .
Einstein's equation demonstrated that some of the energy released when the universe began was quickly turned into matter, the first matter in the universe.
ever expanding according to albert Einstein
The static UNIVERSE model (not a theory) holds that our Universe has been in gravitational balance for all eternity. If general relativity correctly described gravitational interaction of matter -- and Einstein DEFINITELY believed in his model -- then the Universe would have to collapse into a singularity, a fact Einstein recognized almost immediately. He thus made this collapse disappear with a wave of his hand, saying the Universe contained a force (he called it the Cosmological Constant) that perfectly balanced against a collapse by gravity. Jesuit priest George LeMaitre showed that our Universe did not need Einstein's CC if it were expanding -- an idea Einstein ridiculed. When Edwin Hubble showed that our Universe IS, indeed, expanding; Einstein admitted his CC was his "greatest blunder."
Einstein invented nothing. He wrote theories as to how the universe works.
The Elegant Universe - 2003 Einstein's Dream 1-1 was released on: USA: 28 October 2003