answersLogoWhite

0

Paranormal Activity Movie

Written and directed by Oren Peli, Paranormal Activity is a supernatural horror film released in 2007. It was presented in a ‘found footage’ genre, a filmmaking style that uses recovered footage from dead or missing protagonists.

500 Questions

When did paranormal start?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Belief in the paranormal has existed for centuries, with stories of ghosts, mediums, and supernatural phenomena dating back to ancient civilizations. However, the modern concept of paranormal activity and scientific investigation into it began to gain popularity in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Notable events, such as the rise of spiritualism and the founding of organizations like the Society for Psychical Research, helped to shape how we perceive the paranormal today.

What does whirlwind of activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

i am in 5th grade and i had an assignment saying the metaphor a worldwind of activity. I asked my teacher what that ment and she said it means there is a lot going on like a comotion.

-unknown

Who is Katie in Paranormal Activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Katie Featherston is her real name. Micah Sloat is also Micah's real name. The actors gave their characters their own real names to help perpetuate the illusion that the movie is real.

Did the film 'Paranormal Activity' cause heart attacks?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, the movie has cause people have heart attacks. It all depends on how big your screen is and how loud you watch it, also whether you are in a group or alone. Heart attacks have been reported from people who were under an influence, weed for example. When you feel paranoid you increase your heart rate, well movie just adds it up, and there you go heart attack. Most people will live through, but some just can't take such a load.

Is Paranormal Entity a true story?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Paranormal Entity is a fictional story. However some people do experience hautings by spirits and demons. The movie is fictional, the experiences are possible. Dont go looking for ghosts unless your interested in danger. Ouija boards are an example of a dangerous way to communicate with the past.

+++

More "dangerous" are those who delight in using internet fora and other ways to try to terrify people into thinking ghosts, demons and Ouija-boards are real. I regard it as a form of cyber-bullying. By all means watch horror films for entertainment, but they are all fiction - and a Ouija-board is only a bit of painted plywood used by those who delight in frightening themselves in childish games. I am aware that people do sometimes experience peculiar sensations etc., often when falling asleep, but these are all internal, often physiological, and have nowt whatsoever to do with faeries and hobgoblins that don't exist anyway.

Did they ever find hunter rey from Paranormal Activity 2?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The movie isnt a true story, because if you sear katie and hunter in images, katie and hunter whereabouts "unknown" is a lie. she has won many awards and has acted in other films such as: Mutation, and Psychic Experiment. so being hidden is a lie and makes viewers want to know more, its called a cliffhanger.

Also she acts in paranormal activity 3 aswell. so she is not hidden so for ruining the mystery sort of thing

Is there going to be a Paranormal Activity 2?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes. Paranormal Activity 2 is due out in October 2010, although release dates are subject to change. See the Related Link below.

By the way, Paranormal Activity is not based on a true story.

Are any of the Thirteen Ghosts from the movie based off of anyone?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

I could be wrong, but I don't think so. The movie Thirteen Ghosts (2001) was actually a remake of a really fun old movie by the same name, which came out in 1960. The movie was about a boy and his family who move into a house that is haunted by thirteen ghosts.

The movie really isn't very scary (it's really campy, actually) but it has a great gimmick to it. The DVD comes with a special "ghost viewing/ghost removing lens" (which is actually just a card with a piece of clear red plastic, and a piece of clear blue plastic). If you look through the red piece, you see the ghosts on the screen, and if you look through the blue piece, you don't (if you just plain look at the screen, without looking through the lens at all, you just see the ghosts very faintly).

Anyway, each of the ghosts has a separate, distinct personality: like, there's an Italian chef ghost, and a headless lion tamer ghost, who has a ghost lion accompanying him, and then there's a ghost that is nothing but a pair of arms holding an axe, another ghost that is just a big head, a lady ghost who always hangs from a noose, etc.

So, I suppose it's possible that the ghosts in the Thirteen Ghosts remake were based on real people. But I think it's more likely that they just followed in the original movie's footsteps and based their 13 ghost characters on those ghosts.

Was there really a carter simms paranormal investigator?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

There has yet to be proof of a ghost hunter named Carter Simms, but who knows, perhaps if you dig deep enough you may find something relating to her, other then that she is probably fictional

Did Thomas Finley murder his sister Samantha Finley?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

(Note: The people spoke of below are not real, but were in a movie called "Paranormal Entity" a take off of the movie "Paranormal Activity". Neither of those movies were true, they are listed as fiction.)

Answer 1:

No, The movie and video proof clearly shows that "Nighmare" (the Raping demon) Raped her and killed her. If this video proof is actually accurate all of the things i just said are true.

Answer 2:

The footage from the tapes were never completely looked at. A scene where the TV came on by itself and a table moves shortly after is never questioned, nor is it even looked at or brought up. The cameras are going all the time but in the case where the Doctor is killed, we only see him after the fact.

All the other footage we see something occurring right as it happens. The sisters room has a cam in the closet, yet we never see what was on it before the apparent killing. We hear Samantha screaming, her brother screaming, calling out her name. She is never screaming his name, nor is she screaming "stop" or anything in defense, she is clearly terrified. We see her covered in blood, and then the next we see her completely cleaned up with what looks like a rather big scratch or stab wound in her chest.

So if Thomas Finley actually did murder his sister, he was clever enough to cover it up with splotchy footage.

He was careful to set the stage and document everything about their feelings and the things supposedly going on in the house, to make anyone watching believe that there was some sort of evil presence in the house. If he did kill her he could easily blame it on the entity and try using the footage as evidence that something else did the dirty work.

But again, the camera that was in Samantha's room where we find her screaming, is never shown to be on before the time of the attack, so we are left to guess. We hear him running into the room and certainly she is alive at that point and then dead the next. But again, the only camera running is the one Thomas is holding which he drops and then we hear her screaming suddenly stop.

If we want to answer whether or not he killed her we need to see the camera that was in her room, and the one in the living room where the doctor was found and see the entire thing because that footage is conveniently left out.

A killer who wants us to believe that something else did this will go out of his way to prove it. But this doesn't and is also amateur footage, and two key points are left out and up to us to guess. I would say he did it. wanted us to believe that something else did it, but the camera's weren't rolling when the doc dies, and the camera wasn't rolling in his sisters room at the time just before her attack. Convenient omissions.

I personally think the reason why so much was left out is because the scenes could have been WAY too gruesome for the public to see and the police or whoever found the tapes in the attic thought that these scenes on the cameras of the living room and Samantha's bedroom closet were in fact too gruesome for the public to view.

Answer 3. Paranormal entity is actual live footage released against the authorities wishes, thomas and Samantha finley are real people, and the movie is categorized as reality. they are actual tapes showing the disturbing footage of the grisly house held events and the "murder" of 19 year old Samantha. the police had came and investigated the scene, where they found the young girl, bloodied, scratched and beaten, in her terrified brothers arms. And at the time, the cause of death was a mystery, she had no scratch wounds deep enough to cause any internal injury, it was as if her heart was forcibly stopped. After thomas was arrested on 2 counts of murder, the police came back to investigate more, it was then The tapes were found in the attic. After the tapes were looked over, they were stored away and labeled as, "the finley "murder" tapes", they were supposed to have never been seen again, until a few people working within the investigation, handed copies of the tapes over the the asylum company, for a "small" fee of course. Some of the footage was cut out, as it would have been too gruesome, to have showed the tapes of the young girl getting raped and injured by an unknown entity, and the paranormal investigator getting killed. Shortly after his arrest, the cops refused to believe such tapes, as it was too much for them to bear, and proceeded with charging thomas with the murders, who shortly after, killed himself in the prison cell he was held in. And the mother, knowing her two children had died, killed herself in the ward she was in. It's things like this that just go to show you, you shouldn't mess with spirits. paranormal activity however, was entirely fictional.
the footage from the tapes were never completely looked at. A scene where the TV came on by itself and a table moves shortly after is never questioned, nor is it even looked at or brought up. The camera's are going all the time but in the case where the Dr is killed, we only see him after the fact. All the other footage we see something occurring right as it happens. The sisters room has a cam in the closet, yet we never see what was on it before the apparent killing. We hear Samantha screaming, her brother screaming, calling out her name. She is never screaming his name, nor is she screaming "stop" or anything in defense, she is clearly terrified. We see her covered in blood, and then the next we see her completely cleaned up with what looks like a rather big scratch or stab wound in her chest.

So if Thomas Finley actually did murder his sister, he was clever enough to cover it up with splotchy footage.

He was careful to set the stage and document everything about their feelings and the things supposedly going on in the house, to make anyone watching believe that there was some sort of evil presence in the house. If he did kill her he could easily blame it on the entity and try using the footage as evidence that something else did the dirty work.

But again, the camera that was in Samantha's room where we find her screaming, is never shown to be on before the time of the attack, so we are left to guess. We hear him running into the room and certainly she is alive at that point and then dead the next. But again, the only camera running is the one Thomas is holding which he drops and then we hear her screaming suddenly stop.

If we want to answer whether or not he killed her we need to see the camera that was in her room, and the one in the living room where the doctor was found and see the entire thing because that footage is conveniently left out.

A killer who wants us to believe that something else did this will go out of his way to prove it. But this doesn't and is also amateur footage, and two key points are left out and up to us to guess. I would say he did it. wanted us to believe that something else did it, but the camera's weren't rolling when the doc dies, and the camera wasn't rolling in his sisters room at the time just before her attack. Convenient omissions.

ZeroBlood89 : I personally think the reason why so much was left out is because the scenes could have been WAY too gruesome for the public to see and the police or whoever found the tapes in the attic thought that these scenes on the cameras of the living room and Samantha's bedroom closet were in fact too gruesome for the public to view.


Pinky24: I do believe that their was something in the house. It is clear with the footage that their was something tormenting the people in the house mostly the sister. The table moving, the mother waking up and not knowing what she is doing, the foot prints on the ceiling, the constant screaming of Sam because she was being attacked. If Thomas was faking all of this I think that is EXTREMELY unlikely. People do not like to believe that there are evil entities in this world well WAKE UP people there are and some of them hate us for some reason maybe its because we are alive and they aren't or maybe in real life they were NUTS to begin with. Look at the facts THOMAS DIDN'T KILL HIS SISTER! That is just ridiculous to think so! Cameras were set up for the purpose to prove that there was something there tormenting them... and it WAS in fact proven and now he sits in jail to rot because of an entity that killed his little sister... Let the man out he lost his entire family and I am sure being in jail does not help him to move forward in life.... People that don't believe get a LIFE!

yelloflash2: in my opinion i believe that thomas finley did not kill his sister cause during the end she is floating in the air covered in blood then the next time we see her she is on the ground and clean besides the cut on her chest. also in one part of the tapes it showes that there where foot prints on the ceiling and then the door closes. also when thomas was in the house alone it showes him getting chased and the trip wire comes off the wall and hit him and when the door closes you hear banging on the door repedaly. also during one part of the tape you hear the mother come home with samatha scared and tells thomas that the entity grabed samatha and pulled her off the bed. well that's my opinion i believe it is real and don't mess with the paronormal stuff even if you do think what you know you shouldn't mess with it.

lkhanson74: Are you all nuts??? At the very end of the credits, did you not read that this was all fiction and not real? Watch it again and then scroll to the very end of the credits. READ! While I really enjoyed the film, I must say it was very well done to make the film appear to be reality. While you read and assume the story is taken from a real incident, you will find that maybe 5% is the real story. Take the Exorcism of Emily Rose. Great detective horror film based on a real event. Very little of the event was used. The real story is based on a catholic family in Germany. There is a film made in Germany that tells the real story. The two are nothing alike.


alijoee1994: and did anybody notice when the phone is ringing after he was chased that when he picked it up, that the phone was not lit up? that is what ruined it for me and the ringtone that they had iPhone does not have!

Answer 3:
If You Guys Watched Till The VERY End, It Said That All The Events Were Fictitious. It Was Just A Different Story That Some Director Came Up With To Fit The Crime.


Kiethcr: Yea guys, if you actually believed that all of this footage was real then you need to take another look at the movie. Another thing besides the obvious fact that it says the whole movie was a fictitious rendering is the fact that it ACTUALLY HAS A DIRECTOR!! If these tapes were real property of the county police (I can't recall the county's name at this moment) then it wouldn't have a director, let alone an entire credits reel. Think it through people.

cadiz44: did yall notice how wonderfully set up the rooms were? what 19 year old teenage girl has a room like that? please, and the composition book on her dresser never moved..



some of it was different, around 95% was. but i can tell you it was a real story. I know I lived next door. I was there when they moved in, and i was there when the police took them out.
so yes the story is real. The movie maybe 95% There were some odd thing with that house from the time the last people moved out.
in yes, the last owner's farther had died in that house from old age.
do not ask from the address. The old house was tore down and a new house sits there to day.



Cntry Grl: Regardless of whether or not this movie is real or not or a movie made up to play off of something real..Why hasn't anyone addressed the fact that his sister was not scared of him in anyway shape or form. She was always calling out to thomas for help. I don't believe that there was any shotty footage done to cover up what "he had done". I don't think thomas killed nor attacked sam.

And as others have posted how was there footsteps of ash all over the walls and ceiling. And why did she get pulled off the bed in the hotel and attacked at the hotel if it was all thomas when he stayed home alone. And yes he was even attacked minorly when he was home alone. No some of the story doesn't seem clear because obviously they didn't show every detail of everything for the very reason all has said being that it would have been to gruesome for public viewing.

But what ya'll don't seem to understand or address is if it was thomas attacking his sister she woulda been terrified of him from the very start and not calling to him for help when she was being attacked. And how do you explain her in the air one min before she died then the next not? Also I don't think sam would have let thomas help her when she was in the bathtub completely naked trying to help her with whatever was hurting her. And how do you explain the banging on the door when the entity was attacking thomas when he was home alone. Ya'll need to address those facts especially the one of sam not being afraid of her brother and calling to him for help! But someone does need to set the story straight!!!! Cause everyone obviously has there own conclusion and thoughts of it all. But somewhere it deffinately has to be a real story for a lot people to point out more so that it is then it's not from what I've read up on. Just my opinion. But really if it was thomas then why wasn't sam ever running from her own brother!?!?!?
This isnt tru





Is Paranormal Activity 4 on Netflix?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

no because paranormal activity 3 was the beginning of kristi and kaite when they are still small and the poster of paranormal activity 3 a word that says ,,Discover how the activity began,,, in paranormal activity 1.and.2 , kristi and kaite are now mothers not the same houses but they are sisters when they are still small.

In the movie Paranormal Activity are Katie and Micah dead in real life?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Paranormal Activity was one of the first films to capitalize on the "found footage" genre. Much like the Blair Witch Project, which was also very successful, Paranormal Activity is filmed to look like a home video. This led to many people believing that it was actually true. Because of this fact, people flocked to the theaters to see it. The director decided to dedicate the movie to Micah and Katie to give it even more of a sense of realism.

The marketing tricks worked. The movie only cost $15,000 to make, but has grossed more than $100 million so far!

Why did the actors lie on Paranormal Activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

yes, in the end it mentions a little note, they got paid very little to do it too

What is the movie where the family who moves in a new home and is haunted who has daughters and it is a true story and is not amytiville and not excorcist and it came out in the 80's or 90's?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

There is a movie that is currently in theaters called "The Conjuring". It is about a family that moves into a house and becomes haunted. They had four daughters. They tried to get help from paranormal experts and a priest.

Is there nudity in Paranormal Activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, at the beginning. It opens on the shower in the girls locker room when Carrie first gets her period and gets scared while everyone laughs at her.

What are the 3 different endings in Paranormal Activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The real ending is where katie kills the boy then sits at the end of the bed for three days rocking back and forth with a knife in her hand then the cops come and shoot her.

The second is the one in the cinema where the boy gets thrown at the camera. and the last one is where katie slits her throt

What is the order of Paranormal Activity movies is it 3 2 1 then will it be 4?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The movies actually go in reverse so chronologically its Paranormal Activity 3, then 2 then 1 and the end of the second one concludes the trilogy.

The fourth movie picked up about 5 years after the end of the 2nd movie, and followed Hunter (then 6 years old) and his aunt Katie. Paranormal Activity 5 will be released in October 2014, but the storyline of the movie has not yet been released.

What was the word written in the door in the movie Paranormal Activity 2?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Ali Rey sees the word "Meus," scratched into a door. Meus is actually the Latin word for "Mine".

How does Paranormal Activity 2 end?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

#1.The demon possess the body of Katie, she kills Micah her boyfriend and throws him at the camera. It says in the End that his body was found the next day, and she is still missing.

#2. The demon possess the body of Katie and kills Micah her boyfriend then proceeds back upstairs and slits her own throat in front of the camera.

#3. The demon possess the body of Katie and kills Micah her boy friend,then after rocking her self by the bed the whole day the cops come, find her, then she runs towards them and they are forced to shoot her.

What was the Production Budget for Paranormal Activity 3?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Production Budget for Back to the Future Part III was $40,000,000.

What is fraudulent activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Fraudulent behavior is when someone is being dishonest and could be something like someone saying if you sent me $5000 I will get you to Canada and then once they have the money they would steal it and you would never hear from them again.

Did the people in Paranormal Activity really die?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The people in the Blair Witch prodject were hired by directors Daniel Myrick and Eduaro Sanchez. They did not die seeing as after the film was published, co-star Joshua Leonard. Here is the link to the interveiw, interveiwed after the movie was published.

http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/int/1999/07/13/witch_actor/

& if you still don't believe that the movie was all fake, and that they were hired to go in the woods and pretend to be lost, and cold and hungry and haunted by a ''witch'' to make money and sell their movies, then why don't you also read this.

http://www.snopes.com/horrors/ghosts/Blair.asp

if you still want to believe that there is some ''witch'' suposibley haunting the woods of Maryland then go right ahead and believe it, and by the way, if somone actually died wouldn't they have records of this ? Wouldn't there be so much more proof, then some footage that was suposibly found in a 100 year-old cabin found in the middle of the woods. Well , then if you want to believe that then you go right ahead, when I first saw the movie I believed it too, until I found out more information on the internet, and I really thought about it, like yeah right, there is witches haunting woods, haha. mhmm in your freakin' dreams America :) so if you want to believe that, then you go right ahead. I'm just saying dead Joshua could not have an interview with somone after the movie if he was dead. :D

---------------------------------------------------------

Im sorry, I don't think that he/she asked for your opinion of the movie, of course its fake. Like most movies, at the end they had the credits of who helped make the movie and the behind the scenes, so there you go. Anyways I vbelieve, according to the story, the hermit (aka the Blair Witch) did kill the 3, first John, then the others found the house. I believe that when the got knocked out, he later killed the rest. Theres your answer, and The Blair Witch is back.

What are the effects of paranormal activity?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

A sign of paranormal activity is when you hear strange noises or see something unexplained that might be that you have a ghost or demon in your home or anywhere.