The war wasn't going to well for the Russians, which was a reflection on the Russian society as a whole. Another words the poverty, corruption, and low morale on the front lines matched their homeland also. But the war was killing husbands, sons, and fathers...consequently the war brought the necessity to bring an end to the suffering at both home and the war...hence the future Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 (12 years later).
The Slavic people were the same ethnic group as the Russians, so they wanted to support them against Austria-Hungary, whom Russia was fighting land for.
The Slavic people were the same ethnic group as the Russians, so they wanted to support them against Austria-Hungary, whom Russia was fighting land for.
If by the revolution you mean the Bolshevik Revolution, then no, the tsarist government did not support it. If they had supported it, there would have been no revolution, just a peaceful transition of power.
You don't - You explain the benefits that support could provide for the child.
Some Russians supported the Bolshviks because they felt they offered a chance to escape the miserable living conditons imposed by the tsarist regime.
Marie Antoinette did not help the French Revolution. As the queen, she was against the revolution and did not support the revolt of her people.
Propaganda
Propaganda
They were fighting the Russians--the Cold War era.
written to convince voters to support the new constitution
Hobos in the street
Thomas Jefferson