The Northern soldiers (also known as the Yankees) spent about $6 billion total. Now days, that would be worth $71 billion. The Southern soldiers (also known as the confederates) spent about $3 billion dollars.
About 8 billion dollars
over 1billion dollars
Joe mama1
Less then four months.
Tax and spend, take credit for the Republican's push for civil rights, and keep dropping "advice" on the Vietnamese.
Horses were vital to the Union army. They were needed to pull supply wagons and were used by the US cavalry forces. The Union army spent $1 million each month to feed their horses.
North advantages: The North had great advantages in manpower, material, and organization. It had more than twice the population of the South, and many more factories to produce war supplies. The U.S. government had been functioning well for many decades, and the national level had sufficient powers under the Constitution to wage war effectively. South advantages: Most Southern men were experienced in riding horses, hunting, and shooting. Its military leaders were experienced and effective, while the Northern armies struggled to find good leadership. Southerners were fighting to defend their own land, and thus had a strong incentive to fight well. South Disadvantages: The CSA constitution created a loose association of the individual states, and it was sometimes difficult to get all of them to work together smoothly.
They sat in their offices, talked and complained anout the North.
The differences between the North and the South were that North was anti-slavery, and the South was pro-slavery. The North had more resources, men, and money to spend than the South did.Ê The South was farming and plantation crops, and the North was more refined cities while the Northern states were more politically Republican, and the Southern states more Democratic.
The North's military spending to $3.2 Billion. Funds to use in the war came from income taxes, war bonds and exports of wheat. The North far out spent the South, which was based primarily on the problems the South had in raising funds.
On a per capita basis, the South spent $111 based on its population. As for the North, the per capita spending was $98. The basic reason for the South's higher amount was due to the smaller population it had in comparison to the North.
France is to the North and Spain is to the South. Andorra is a landlocked country. They speak Catalan and spend Euros.
if anyone is wanting this answer you go to an other website because we are not giving it
This is a more complicated question than you would think.The South had a policy of inflationary currency, this means that things cost much much more in the south than the north. TO the point that currency was used as wall paper because it was cheaper.The south did not have as large an industrial base as the North and that made things much more expensive to build.Much of the war Material had to be imported by the South, again very expensive.In the end while the South probably spent more money, but the North built more war supplies by far and equipped more troops.So what it comes down to: what does your teacher want to hear? The North was able to produce and deploy significantly more material and troops and that is what made the difference in the war.
They spend there life in the north pole.
after the civil war ended the south had more time to build and grow or because they spend less on heat the more to every thing Else
Yes. Peregrine (not Perigrin) Falcons are found across many parts of England. They are resident in north east, north west and south west England all year round, and some spend the winter in the south east and east Anglian areas.
cuz the south is mostly kinda an agricultural thing...i oughta know, i am a southerner. that and we spend all of are money in beer, guns, and ammo. then whatver is left gose to are in of the world plans.
Each day for a Union Soldier during the Civil War started at sunrise. They would then spend mornings and afternoons preparing for battles.