Yes and no. If a federal court issues a temporary injunction, or stay, against enforcing a particular law pending the outcome of a case, then the law is suspended unless or until that court, or a higher court, vacates the stay (nullifies the order, allowing the law to be enforced).
If no court order is issued relative to the law while the case is under review, it can continue to operate and be enforced. Sometimes the government will voluntarily refrain from using the law pending the Court's decision, however, particularly if they anticipate it may be nullified as a result of the case. This helps reduce the administrative burden and expense of subsequent litigation that may arise if the legislation is determined to be unconstitutional.
judicial review
I do not know who said that but if you are wondering what it refers to, that would be a judicial review.
Judicial Review
That power is the power of judicial review.
Judicial review... which was given binding authority by Maybury v Madison in 1803
judicial review
A judicial review allows the Supreme Court to annul any acts of the state that is deemed to be unconstitutional. This decision was made during the Marbury v. Madison case which stated that they have the right to review the acts of Congress to determine its constitutionality.
no the power of judicial review is not mentioned in the constitution. because Judicial Review was used in 13th century law but the courts didn't agree with it so it was forgotten. until the case of Marbury v. Madison that is when Judicial Review came back to the power of the Supreme Court.
"Constitution review" most likely refers to the courts' power of judicial review. For more information about judicial review, see Related Questions, below.
Judicial Review
Judicial review is an implied power of the Judicial Branch in the US government, but an established practice in common law.
no it does not