clearly a giant worthless inhumane godforsaken insane ruthless stupid, for lack of better words, leader
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
both
i have no idea!! i think he was a bad leader coz all he cared about was the money he had got from royalty
A good leader knows what needs to be done and steps out to do it. He may need help in managing the items needed to get the job done.
Hirohito was a good Emperor that made bad desions in his life
It all depends on your point of view. If a leader supports and progresses the ideas you believe in, then you would consider him a good leader. If a leader supports and progresses ideas and laws that you disagree with, then you would consider him a bad leader. A good leader is one who keeps the people he is in charge of safe from harm; allow them to achieve their personal goals and potentials while respecting the rights of others.
I think that he was sometimes good and sometimes bad. He wanted communism to start back up in the Soviet Union.
There is really no precise answer to what makes a bad sports leader because it's mostly a matter of an opinion. To say what a bad one is I would say the opposite of what makes a good one. A bad leader is a person who is selfish, not a model citizen, not dedicated, can't lead by example more of a follower than a leader, a person who gives only what it takes to get by, can't relate with team mates, and probably a few other things but that is what I think would be the most important for a good leader. He/She should also be very good at giving advice
No, he led his army into battle not thinking of the bad cause it would make.
elmer is a good student but a bad leader...elmer is much bitter..elmer is good...
Bill Clinton was very famous (for good and bad reasons).
I think Hannibal was a quite good leader because not many people could at the age of 26 lead an army which consisted of over 70000 people plus he was mercy less to his enimies. Eventhough he was outnumbered he led his soldiers to victory against the romans.