0
the plebians and the patricians
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was ancient Egypt's economy based on division of social classes?
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
What was each social classes in ancient rome like?
They were different becuase each class did something different
Did ancient Rome have social classes?
The economy was based on harvesting, production and trade of economically valuable products. The politics was based on social aspects. Social classes arose largely from economic status.
How were patricians different from other social classes in Ancient Rome?
The patricians were the Roman aristocracy.
What rights and freedom did people from of the social classes have?
It varied according to the different peoples throughout the ancient world.
What were some social classes in ancient Greece?
hahaahahhaahahah
Was ancient Rome's economy based on social classes?
no it is not
How many social classes in ancient Egypt?
100012
What were the social classes in the Philippines during ancient times?
philippine in ancient time ?
What is a social pyramid?
The population of ancient Egypt was divided into groups of people with different jobs and responsibilities to society. These social classes were structured as a pyramid with six levels.
What were the two main social groups in rome?
There were seven social classes in ancient Rome. they were the patricians, plebeians, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen, the slaves and foreigners. The last "class" the foreigners, were not Roman but many of them lived in the city and did not fit in with any Roman class.
Where was the social classes in anchien rome?
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
