Byzantine Empire is a term historians have coined to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire in 476. The western part fell under the weight of the invasions by Germanic peoples. The eastern part was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist from another 1,000 years. The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the name of the Greek city of Byzantium which was redeveloped, turned into the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople (city of Constantine) by Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to refer tot the fact that this empire quite soon became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, about 150 years after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. The Romans did not use this term. They used Roman Empire or Romania (which did not refer to the modern county of Romania).
The Byzantine emperors did what emperos do. They ruled their empire
The Byzantine emperor was an absolute ruler. He also exerted control over the church of the empire, the Orthodox Christian Church.
The Emperors Justinian and Basil II
Both emperors improved the Byzantine legal system by organizing laws more clearly.
Justinian I, Leo III, John I Tzimisces, Basil II, Manuel I
Well considering that he was the Byzantine emperor (the eastern Roman Empire was called the Byzantine Empire and did not fall when the western one did), I'd say many. He actually was more like Roman emperors then his Byzantine predecessors and attempted to restore the old borders of the empire.
what was one of the major differences between the powers of the emperors in the east and the west
me
Diocletian
The Emperors Justinian and Basil II
It was to expensive to restore the old Roman Empire
It varied. The Byzantine emperors reigned for life. Some of the emperors reigned for along time, while others died shorty after their accession to power. The length of the reign of emperors also depended on the political stability of he empire. The empire went thought periods of instability which was usurper emperors and/or civil wars. In such periods power changed hands quickly.
Both emperors improved the Byzantine legal system by organizing laws more clearly.
Justinian I, Leo III, John I Tzimisces, Basil II, Manuel I
They were very strong & had some good emperors. They are the continuation of Rome.
Well considering that he was the Byzantine emperor (the eastern Roman Empire was called the Byzantine Empire and did not fall when the western one did), I'd say many. He actually was more like Roman emperors then his Byzantine predecessors and attempted to restore the old borders of the empire.
The successors were usually the sons of the emperors or a memeber of the his family and this empire had a number of dynsaties
Both emperors expanded the boundaries of the empire by conquering regions along the Mediterranean Sea. -Apex- :)
what was one of the major differences between the powers of the emperors in the east and the west