0
(TERRY) STOP AND FRISK
and Related Fourth Amendment Cases
Weeks v. United States, (1914) held that evidence obtained in the course of a warrantless search and seizure could not be used to convict a defendant in a federal case (did not apply to the states).
Elkins v. United States, 364 US 206 (1960) applied the federal government's definition of Fourth Amendment "reasonable search and seizure" to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961), applied the exclusionary rule established for federal cases in Weeks v. US, (1914) to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The "exclusionary rule" prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used to prosecute a defendant.
Beck v. Ohio, 379 US 89 (1964), police cannot justify an arrest based on evidence obtained during a search following the arrest.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968) held police could conduct a warrantless stop-and-frisk if they had probable cause to believe the suspect was engaged in illegal activity or exhibiting behavior indicating he (or she) was about to engage in illegal activity.
Sibron v. New York, 392 US 40 (1968) was consolidated with Terry v. Ohio, because it was substantially similar and addressed the same constitutional issues, but it had a somewhat different outcome than Terry.
Chimel v. California, 395 US 752 (1969) held police could conduct a warrantless search in the immediate vicinity of the area where an arrest took place.
US v. Robinson, 414 US 218 (1973), held that a warrantless full-body search following a lawful arrest is constitutional, and that any evidence obtained may be used to convict the suspect.
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 US 106 (1977), held that requiring a person to step out of a stopped vehicle and conducting a standard frisk was constitutional under the Fourth Amendment because it involved no substantial invasion of privacy.
Brown v. Texas, 443 US 47 (1979), held it is unconstitutional to stop a party exclusively for the purpose of obtaining identification, and overturned a Texas law making it a crime for a person to refuse to identify him- or herself to police. "In the absence of any basis for suspecting Brown of misconduct, the balance between the public interest and Brown's right to personal security and privacy tilts in favor of freedom from police interference." ["Search and Seizure Case Briefs, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Justice Cabinet, Department of Criminal Justice Training, Legal Section," page 35]
Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 US 85 (1979), a general warrant allowing police to search a business does not extend to searching patrons of the business in the absence of other probable cause that would normally allow a Terry frisk.
Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), held a Terry frisk could be extended to the passenger compartment of a vehicle in a roadside stop.
California v. Greenwood, 486 US 35 (1988), held that police could conduct a warrantless search of a suspect's trash cans, bags or other outdoor receptacles on the basis that "animals, children, scavengers, snoops, and other members of the public" already had access to the trash, and therefore the suspect had no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993), held that police may seize contraband found on a suspect during a Terry frisk if the object could be readily identified during the course of the pat-down.
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000), held that fleeing from police, by itself, was reason enough to perform a Terry stop.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What actors and actresses appeared in Terry from Ohio - 2012?
The cast of Terry from Ohio - 2012 includes: Caitlin Benya as Lisa Christopher Daftsios as Terry Tom Schubert as Rick
Who was the defendant in Terry v Ohio?
In the US Supreme Court case, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the respondent (like a defendant) in the case was the State of Ohio. John W. Terry was the petitioner or appellant (like a plaintiff).Terry was appealing his criminal conviction in People v. John W. Terry, 95 Ohio L. Abs. 321 (Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County 1964), in which Terry had been the defendant and the State of Ohio had been the plaintiff.
When was Terry Grafton born?
Terry Grafton was born in 1927, in Saline, Ohio, USA.
Did Terry v. Ohio go to the US Supreme Court?
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)Yes. John W. Terry, the defendant in State of Ohio v. Terry, appealed constitutional issues involved in his criminal conviction n the case Terry v. Ohio to the US Supreme Court. His appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was dismissed for lack of a substantial constitutional question. Terry v. Ohio was argued on December 12, 1967 and the decision was issued on June 10, 1968.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What are the related cases with Mapp v Ohio?
There are no other 'related' cases. The US Supreme Court only takes one representative case for review when considering the constitutionality of a law. If, indeed, there even were other cases, ONLY the Mapp v. Ohio case was chosen.
What amendment intreprets terry vs Ohio?
fourth :)
What college did Terry Glenn attend?
Ohio State
When was Terry Bevington born?
Terry Bevington was born on July 7, 1956, in Akron, Ohio, USA.
When was Terry Giancaterino born?
Terry Giancaterino was born on March 26, 1963, in Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
When was Terry Harbin born?
Terry Harbin was born on April 6, 1958, in Euclid, Ohio, USA.
Where does probable cause come from?
Terry v. Ohio, 1968.
What U.S. Supreme Court Reporter and Lawyers Edition Reporter published Terry v. Ohio?
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
