It was not very good. In fact, most slaves weren't allowed any privileges that whites were allowed.
Answer:
The legal status of slaves was "chattel" or "property". They were not counted among the human population of the country. They had no rights.
As far as can be discerned, slaves in Delaware, Washington DC, Missouri and Kentucky had no "civil rights". They were judged to be "property". This was the same situation in the "South" which eventually became the Confederate States of America. The US Supreme Court tuled in 1857, via the Dred Scott case that slaves could not be citizens and they had no recourse to the US court systems. The decision apparently affected all Afro-Americans in the US at the time.
Slaves in other places in the Western Hemisphere were no better off. This situation varied, however, depending on what European nation that slaves or even freed slaves, found themselves in. Slavery was last abolished in Brazil towards the end of the 19th Century.
SHORT-STAPLE
Most slaves lived on plantations with 20 or more other slaves, or in the case of a small slave owner, had links with slaves nearby. Slave owners were supposed to house, feed, and clothe their slaves from infancy till death. Most slaves worked in the fields, though some of the women were used as house servants, wet nurses, or 'babysitters,' and the men as coachmen.
South Carolina had so many slaves that there were more African slaves than Caucasian citizens. Because of its role in the business of slavery, South Carolina had a lot of authority in Southern policy-making in the eighteenth century.
No. Sydney has never been in either the colony or state of South Australia. Sydney has only ever been located in New South Wales, which was the first colony in Australia. It is on the eastern coast, not in the south.
Africa. West African slaves were brought to the West Indies from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries.
? Shipped to the North? Cleaned by workers who were payed and not slaves? Cheap?
melville
South Africans
Africa, Asia, and the South Pacific
Unlike most of Ausalia's other states, it was not gold that attracted immigrants to South Australians in their thousands. It was copper. Copper mining was a most lucrative prospect in the nineteenth century.
expansion of southern industry
Salvador Allende for one. Chile.
SHORT-STAPLE
Wow u guys awesome my problem
Slavery was legal in both the United States and Great Britain in the first years of the nineteenth century. It was also legal in parts of South America.
they supported the expansion of southern industry
The Samoan Islands in the South Pacific